nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Suddenly Pro-faggot (Obama felching) CBS Paints Pro-Traditional Marriage Petitioners as "Anti-Gay Rights"

Von: Rising Sun (caldera@mediascum.cbs) [Profil]
Datum: 04.11.2009 16:07
Message-ID: <ae60927ef46561dacde8ab68a74061c0@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.states.iowa alt.bible alt.atheism alt.politics.homosexuality alt.politics.usa
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2009/11/03/cbs-paints-
pro-traditional-marriage-petitioners-anti-gay-rights

Should Anti-Gay Rights Petition Signers Be Exposed?" asked a
teaser headline [screencap shown at right] on CBSNews.com's
front page.

"Hot Topic: Battle Rages in Washington State over Privacy of
Petition Signers" the subheader read.

While the November 3 article itself by staffer Brian Montopoli
was balanced -- giving room for a social conservative activist
to defend keeping the names and addresses of signatories of the
Referendum 71 petition from being made public -- the headline
sets the tone for readers to see pro-traditional marriage
backers in Washington State as folks motivated to deprive fellow
citizens of their "rights."

So what does Referendum 71 actually do? According to Montopoli:

Voters in Washington state will decide today on a referendum
that could effectively roll back legislation passed in May to
extend domestic partnership rights and responsibilities to gay
and lesbian couples similar to those granted married
heterosexual couples.

In point of fact, the legislation itself is not yet law, and the
question before voters in Referendum 71 is whether to approve or
reject the enactment of the domestic partnership bill:

The legislature passed Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill
5688 concerning rights and responsibilities of state-registered
domestic partners and voters have filed a sufficient referendum
petition on this bill. This bill would expand the rights,
responsibilities, and obligations accorded state-registered same-
sex and senior domestic partners to be equivalent to those of
married spouses, except that a domestic partnership is not a
marriage. Should this bill be:  Approved ____  Rejected  ____


Far from being "anti-gay", the petition in question is simply a
matter of putting the bill for an up-or-down vote by the
electorate.

Apparently to CBS News, simply putting the matter before the
general public to approve or reject is anti-gay bigotry.


[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]