Re: Obama's Frightening Insensitivity Following Shooting
Von: Alexander Arnakis (invalid@invalid.invalid) [Profil]
Datum: 07.11.2009 22:11
Message-ID: <jqnbf5t72dt4o4eb821usko58m3aio0adh@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox
Datum: 07.11.2009 22:11
Message-ID: <jqnbf5t72dt4o4eb821usko58m3aio0adh@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:51:48 -0500, "~AGG~" <French Polynesia@Pacific-Rim.tf> wrote: > >***If Obama can't whip his party into line, it's because his party has begun >to realize that the 1,990-page disaster awaiting a possible vote in the >House this weekend is an abomination. > Follow the debate and the voting on C-SPAN right now, as I am. There's going to be a vote on the overall bill later tonight -- and you can be assured that Nancy Pelosi wouldn't bring it up unless she was pretty sure she had the votes. The main sticking point will be the Stupak amendment on abortion, which the Republicans will support even though they're all going to vote against the overall bill in the end. Therefore, the Stupak amendment might well pass, and then the question will be how many pro-choice Democrats will vote "no" on the final bill. My guess is not many. (Actually, the bill's overall chances would be *worse* if the Stupak amendment fails. This is another case in which the Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot. If they really wanted to kill the bill, they would tactically vote *against* the Stupak amendment. But since this is a record vote, they have to worry about explaining it to their pro-life constituents.) >***More later. It's nearly time for the Penn State game to begin and I'm >half tanked from the tailgate party!!! What else is new? You appear to be drunk or stoned all the time, judging from your behavior![ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- .Evàristo. (08.11.2009 05:34)
- ~AGG~ (08.11.2009 18:14)
- ~AGG~ (08.11.2009 18:13)
