Why should auditors~4 get support from CofS while auditors~1 are deprived?

It's based on equations like this one:

"justice" = injustice~1 = injustice~(2, 3, 4)


The English words that start with the morpheme "in", supposedly as a
negation, have got to be among the most potentially corrupting in the
language.

That's because "in" can be interpreted in a way that doesn't negate at
all, but rather puts the concept that follows it INSIDE a person.
Once there, that thing, inside, can be confused with its opposite
because now it bears the same name.

It works like this:

"justice" goes inside via injustice~1, which then is equated with
injustice~(2, 3, 4)

=======
INJUSTICE~1
I.
= "in justice"
= "JUSTICE as a mental, moral condition"
II.
= "one's idea of the right administration of what is just"

III.
= "an auditor's~4 standard of perfection of what he believes is the
most morally justifiable employment of meanings (engrams~4) that agree
closely with an original (a truth~1)"
=======

=======
INJUSTICE~2
I.
= "absence of justice"
II.
= "a failure to impartially adjust conflicting claims so as to
reverse the assignment of merited rewards and punishments"

III.
= "with special favor for one's side in a conflict, neglecting to
separate incompatible assertions of value (within a word) so as to
make each assertion correspondent with either oneself or the other
contender --- the purpose of such neglect being to allot the other
contender one's pain, and to take for oneself, resources that are
necessarily his (as his authority, prestige, money, place, pleasure)"
=======

=======
INJUSTICE~3
I.
= "INIQUITY"
= "deviation from just dealing"

II.
= "turning aside from dividing and distributing (a word's meaning) in
portions proven to be valid --- administering the portions instead, in
a ridiculously incongruous combination"
=======

=======
INJUSTICE~4
I.
= "violation of right"
II.
= "an act of irreverence to the cause of truth~2 in spite of one's
steady physical connection to truth~1"
=======

If an auditor~4 were to say, "We believe in justice",  I'd say they
belive in this:

"justice" = injustice~1 = injustice~(2, 3, 4)

The word "justice" is a lie~1.
=======
LIE ~1
I.
= "one that lies"
II.
= "a word that remains in a flat, horizontal position upon a broad
support"

III.
= "a  significant unit of code text, usually a group of letters, that
remains in a stated proposition that:
(1)  isn't jolting or jarring to its speaker
(2) is situated near his widest limit of perception and interest
(3) depends for its validity on behavior in the speaker that is
recognizable in a in a manner that is open to public inspection but
that is unlike the speaker's way of thinking about his proposition"
=======

Why should the CofS support auditors~4 offering only lies~1 and
injustice~(1, 2, 3, 4) ?

Can auditors~4 answer this with anything other than lies~1 ?






+++++++
Glossary
+++++++

=======
auditor~1
I.
= "one authorized (justified) by an attraction to truth~2 to examine
and verify the results coming from probing the meaning of a word"

II.
= "a person, who through the work of his admiration of the
distinguishing quality of truth~2, proves himself to be sufficiently
just to:

(1) test the tangible effects coming from searching through the
logical extension of a printed word or speech sound with great
thoroughness

to...
(2) limit the word's act of signifying, by adding a differentia to it

and to...
(3) build from truth~1 as cause, the engram~2 most matching it in
kind"
=======

=======
auditor~4 (revision A, 7/5/08)
I.
= "one that audits"
= "a person that oddits"
= "an inferior human being who odds it"
= "an enigmatic personality of low rank (low distinction) who chooses
to  classify a group of individuals, so that each lacks its
complementary match "

II.
= "a puzzling person with a feeble faculty of making engrams~4
discernible as separate entities --- who chooses to set the engrams~4
in a word to oppose one another --- rather than pairing them to the
symbols~1 that would form exact pairs with them"
=======

=======
engram~1
I.
= "en + gram"
= "writing provided with a record that was put into it"

II.
= "a word made ready for understanding by the use of information
remaining in permanent form that speakers and their interpreters have
placed into association with it"
=======

=======
engram~2
I.
= "n_ + gram"
= "a variable taking on integral values in an equation between (1)
writing  provided with grammar, and (2) record"

II.
= "an engram~1 subject to change in meaning that --- by means of a
writing of value~1 that conforms to grammatical rules --- accepts in
an identifying relationship, evidence coming from some truth~2, that
remains permanent in its essential structure"
=======

=======
engram~4
I.
= "a memory trace"
= "a trace of memory"
II.
= "a path that one follows giving the content of something
remembered"

III.
= "a way of thought a person obeys, that offers ideas coming from the
neural path that some engram~2 correlates with when that path is again
associated with its engram~1 in the course of speaking"
=======

=======
symbol~1
I.
= "something that suggests something else"

II.
= "experienced existence that puts a different kind of existence
forward by implication"

III.
= "existence proven by conscious participation that puts a result of
truth~1 into a prominent representation coming from truth's~1 state of
being, entailed as a cause that cannot be denied without involving
contradiction"
=======

=======
truth~1

incident I.
= "actual existence"

incident II.
= "not counterfeit being in its actuality"

incident III.
= "material existence that is:
(1) not serving as the reproduction of a symbolic picture

(2) not being used as a picture which causes a new version of
truth's~1 existence to be experienced by someone

(3) the original, the source from which a valid symbolic picture may
arise

...and that is:
(4) composed by the existing thing itself under the circumstances
that have been predestined as necessary in the interaction between the
nature of the surroundings and that of the truth~1 itself"
=======

=======
truth~2
I.
= "being as given in the act of experiencing, that conforms to
reality"

II.
= "a symbol~1 apportioned during the act of experiencing, without
regard to the wishes of the recipients, and that presents and
categorizes an image in agreement with a referred-to aspect of
truth~1"
=======

=======
truth~3
I.
= "the world of a particular person, in a particular manner"

II.
= "the best individual experience of a secretly psychotic person,
this being in his control, and in a pleasing appearance and
characteristic bearing"

III.
= "a most welcome, intended state of mind that forms a significant
and often crucial part of a psychotic's~1 inner religious life as he
works towards hidden aims, while sustaining the burden of his
psychosis with assured pleasing affirmations that often give the
impression of an essential meaning characteristic of those who would
naturally oppose him"
=======

=======
value~1
I.
= "an expression in logic that may replace a variable in a
propositional function so that the resultant is a true or false
statement"

II.
= "a description that symbolizes propriety of quality judged as
present  according to apparent conformity with the dictates of a
system of formal principles of deduction. Since its abbreviation is
liable to vary when used in the point to be maintained in argument,
the description may serve as its successor in order that the resulting
product has individual identity with a declarative sentence
conformable to an original."

III.
= "a statement representing the peculiar nature arising from a
configuration of parts in relation to other parts, some of which have
an effect on the senses of an observer, the possession of the effect
causing the thing to exist as a symbol of the configuration.  The
configuration is formed in a track traveled by an impulse in its
movement through the brain, thereby constituting a conclusive image,
in progress which bears witness to neural activity that is a fairly
certain symptom of its cause.  The image is capable of easy perception
as if adjacent to that source from which its configuration is derived
and it complies with the nervous system's governing laws of logical
abstraction whereby one class is excepted from another in which it is
naturally included. These laws have the power to make the neural
activity seem to itself to consist of the configuration of parts that
caused it.
Often, a simple spoken sound or written word is conveniently
substituted for the whole understood image.  But since such a word is
subject to a selection of its interpretation, and since any change of
that interpretation brings about differences in the part of the
coherent series of reasons that gives the process of reasoning its
effectiveness, the image may be kept in a state of validity using a
series of descriptions that proceed after it in order, according to
their degree of refinement and conformance to the image from which the
description arose.  Duplicates of the valid image, with sameness of
essential nature in different instances, may be produced by another's
intellectual effort, making evident to him the stated judgment of the
nervous system that constructed the value~1"
=======
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]