Re: Theories reducing to Coulombian electrodynamics, relativistic electrodynamics doesn't
Von: KONCHOK.PENDAY (kp@net-prophet.net) [Profil]
Datum: 05.11.2009 19:37
Message-ID: <hcv61g$rnj$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: sci.physics alt.sci.physics.new-theoriessci.skeptic alt.conspiracy alt.ucp
Datum: 05.11.2009 19:37
Message-ID: <hcv61g$rnj$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: sci.physics alt.sci.physics.new-theoriessci.skeptic alt.conspiracy alt.ucp
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:43:56 -0800, CfCS wrote: > _______________________________________________________________________ > > NEW DRAFT > > Theories reducing to Coulombian electrodynamics, relativistic > electrodynamics doesn't > _______________________________________________________________________ Unfortunately, Coulomb has been completely repudiated by Rado as one of the two people [along with Newton] who has completely FUCKED UP PHYSICS FOR HUNREDS OF YEARS NOW! There are NOT two electrical fluids [positive and negative] but ONE, which can be SURPLUS or DEFICIENCY, as Ben Franklin correctly surmised. It is also related to the electron dipole, with intake on one side and exhaust on the other. > A new research draft (40+ pages) is available for download. OK. > Very important physical and philosophical consequences arise from > this work. ???? > This draft analyzes the internal consistency of different theories of > electrodynamics, their compatibility with Coulombian electrodynamics, > and their confrontation with experiments and observations. Now that Coulomb has been DEFINITIVELY DEBUNKED, that's a moot point. > The rigorous analysis shows that the Coulombian limit of relativistic > field electrodynamics given in textbooks and papers is both > mathematical and physically incorrect. Because Coulomb is FATALLY FLAWED! > This is in agreement with > earlier result showed in Phys. Rev. E (1997, 53, 5373; 1998, 57, > 3683). > Moreover, it is showed that only four theories of the analyzed sample > give the exact Coulombian limit in a consistent way. But that's not relevant! > If the results of this draft are confirmed then, contrary to a common > myth, relativistic field electrodynamics will be no longer a covering > theory of all electromagnetic experiments and observations, but a > disjoint theory valid for certain kind of relativistic effects! YES! RELATIVITY IS CRAP TOO! E=MC^2 IS AN *AETHER" EQUATION, stolen my einstein after three aether physists had already published it, starting in 1888! EINSTEIN IS AN INCOMPETENT THIEF! > This disjoint, non-covering, character is illustrated in this Research > draft when showed that relativistic field electrodynamics fails to > correctly account for the topology of the binary interactions in a > system of point charges, whereas Coulombian electrodynamics —and > compatible theories— give us the correct topology. But both Coulomb and Einstein were WRONG! Who cares if they agree? > Finally, this Research draft introduces the new post-relativity theory > and discusses its possibilities and advantages over current theories. But both Coulomb's and Einstein's TURDS HAVE BEEN FULLY FLUSHED! > This Research draft is dedicated to the memory of the physicist > Charles-Augustin De Coulomb. May he soon be forgotten! > His deep insights on the nature of the > electric interactions remained unnoticed in the works of very > important physicists as Maxwell, Einstein, Lorentz, Dirac, Wheeler, > Feynman, and many others. And them remained unnoticed until > mathematicians and physicists have started to show the deficiencies of > the field formulations of electrodynamics 190 years after that Coulomb > passed away! THE ONLY LITTLE PROBLEM IS HE WAS DEAD WRONG! > NEWS AND BLOG: > ______________ > > http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencet oday.html > > http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/20091103.html > > > METADATA, REFERENCES, AND DOWNLOAD: > ___________________________________ > > http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/drafts.html READ RADO! BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written: ============================================ AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT It’s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis by the greatest physicist of all time! http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf ============================================ NO BULLSHIT! I GUARANTEE IT! JUST HARD-NOSED SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY! It’s also the best history of physics ever written! Even better than Richard McKeon! But Rado perfectly illustrates both McKeon's analysis AND PREDICTIONS! HIS "LEAST PARTICLES" ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON'S FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT! THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE. THAT'S A BIG DOUBLE WOW-WOW! CAUTION: *NOT* FOR the faint of heart! May be dangerous to preconceived prejudices! Steve’s site is: http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/ My intro to Steve’s work is: http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm See “05* AETHER PHYSICS” in the right-hand column of my blog at: http://net-prophet.net/blog/ AND the “PHYSICS” CATEGORY in the left-hand column! Also see the "AETHER PHYSICS" TOPIC under the "2-FORUMS" in the blog PAGES. That’s the reading list for now, but "Aethro-dynamics" will be released ANY DAY NOW! O --- ) \ NEWSGROUPS: alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,sci.skeptic,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics, PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p63[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]