Re: Physicsup.com-- Today first chapter of the theory,

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:01:58 -0800, physicsup.com wrote:

>
>              Physicsup.com-- Today first chapter of the> theory,
>  tomorrow second chapter, Optical phenomena.
>                                 Need grammar particularity
>
>                                                         Chapter I
>                                           introduction
>
>              Assumptions and theoretical
>
>          First: The atomic model is currently being used is not valid,

Sure, it's a pile of self-contracictory crap!

> and there is another model reflects the reality of the atom.

There are many other models.

Do they work is the quesion.

>      And can explain all optical phenomena, on the basis of the new
> model, as well as the new model can ,

That's a pretty big claim!

>      Unite the forces of nature on the basis, that it is properties of
> the material.

????

>          Second: repair corrupted theories. and nonsense that have
> been made to the knowledge of physics.

That's a great idea!


>       Say at the outset that there are two types of atoms: - a strong
> nucleus atoms, and  weak nucleus atoms.

???? I see NO basis for such a claim.

>         Atoms are neutral in the normal position, a condition in
> addition to the atom, equalizer particles.

????
Dr: Sadi
> Said Muna
>
>
>
>                                          Hypotheses
>
>
>       I will start assumptions, and I say that there is no limits for
> the matter of the universe.

I don't concurr with that assumption.

> That the universe is unlimited in his
> littleness of its parts or bigness of its parts.

And yet Rado's LEAST PARTS assumption
for the aether works so beautifully!

> If we find in our
> measurement limits, then this universe, is part of the real universe.

????

> The real universe is far greater than we measure.

Yes it is bother bigger and smaller THAN WE CAN MEASURE.

>     As for the lower limits of particles.
> There is no limit to the small mass of material.

Rado would disagree.

> It is wrong to regard the particles of light,
> particles with zero mass.

YES! Light has mass!

> There are mass  of material has a mass less
> than the mass of particle of light.

Aethrons are aethrons.

> If we increased the accuracy of
> our measurements, we can found smaller blocks of the mass than
> particle of light.

Aethrons are the lower limit.

>       The matter or material: did not exterminate does not create but
> develop.

Matter is composed of
condensed aether, yes.

>       No beginning no end of the matter. Allowed to exist in parts of
> the universe develops or beginnings and endings.

Yes. Matter continuously evolves/appears.

>       Exist in the universe only to the material. And that energy is
> moving of matter or material, nothing else.

Just aethrons in motion!

>       These assumptions and laws that we will adopt it,
> I do not want to prove now.

You are UNCLEAR on the concept.
YOU CANNOT PROVE YOUR ASSUMPTIONS.
YOU JUST ASSUME THEM!

>Some are proved and the other I will demonstrate later,

NONE ARE PROVED
YOU WILL MAKE NO
DEMONSTRATION!

> so as not to prolong the issue now.

You cannot prolong a DEAD issue!

>  Dr: Sadi Said Muna
>
>
>
>
>                           Character of particles
>
>       The particles of light and elementary particles are polarized
> particles, charged, and,  have mass. Based on the experiments of
> Stolitov and Libidev. These particles do exist within the atom.

???? OK?

>      The new model explains the structure of the atom, and its
> importance for physics. I say that the new atomic model, is able to
> solve all the problems of physics  easer than the others.

That's a big claim.
The only person I've
seen who can claim
that is Rado.

> Either keep
> hold of old physics. But  is an injustice to mankind, or to accept the
> truth.

I AGREE WITH THAT!

But do you HAVE the truth?

>     There is an equation of energy easy, simple and best of Einstein
> equation one million times.

That's EASY!

He was a moron who
stole from others!

>      I will put the new form of atom soon.

So this is just
promoting something
in the future?

I find that very disappointing.

>                                                           Dr: Sadi
> Said Muna
>
>
>
>
>              Add 23 -10-09
>
>            Before putting the new atomic model, we should understand
> the structure of elementary particles. and identify the charge.

Yes!  We should!

>            All the elementary particles, including particles of light,
> consisting of groups of Mona, strong and weak, and Mona groups

WHO is Mona?

> has a
> combination similar to the structure of atoms but smallest,

????

> if you
> wish, but this only temporarily. If the amount of Mona strong groups
> dominate on weak Mona groups, in this particle, we said that this
> particle is positive

???? WHAT does that mean?

> if the amount of weak Mona groups more
> effective. We say that this a negative particle.

????

> Add that all this
> talk has no scientific meaning,

Certainly none that I can find?

> but will reveal later, and this fact
> will prove itself automatically.

????

> But I want to say, that every
> particle is composed of groups groups groups,

Groups of WHAT?

> and not of a homogeneous
> body as we thought before.

???? WHO IS WE?

> Groups of Mona, weak and strong. In
> different rates, which sets a charge particle.

????

>              This talk is currently weak and temporary,

It seems that way to me!

> It is of great
> importance in the interpretation of all the phenomena of nature,
> easy,

Or so you say!

> and this will be seen later. Everything in nature without
> exaggeration.

OK!

I've heard enough!

READ RADO!

BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It’s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
============================================

NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!

It’s also the best
history of physics
ever written!

Even better than
Richard McKeon!

But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon's analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!

HIS "LEAST PARTICLES"
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON'S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!

THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.

THAT'S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!

CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!

Steve’s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/

My intro to Steve’s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm

See “05* AETHER PHYSICS” in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the “PHYSICS” CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!
Also see the "AETHER PHYSICS" TOPIC
under the "2-FORUMS" in the blog PAGES.

That’s the reading list for now,
but "Aethro-dynamics" will
released ANY DAY NOW!


O
---  )
\


NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,sci.skeptic,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics,
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p60
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]