Re: oye
Von: Roland More (nospamroland@corridor.net) [Profil]
Datum: 02.10.2007 17:49
Message-ID: <470267d0$0$16445$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
Newsgroup: alt.security.alarms
Datum: 02.10.2007 17:49
Message-ID: <470267d0$0$16445$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
Newsgroup: alt.security.alarms
>Were you using Gemini wireless? Yes, GEM 9600 mostly. >Its some of the easiest most trouble free stuff I have ever used I suspect you've never given Inovonics a fair shot. It blows everything else away in my opinion. Even the big retailer in Arkansas uses it. http://www.inovonics.com/category.aspx?id12 >and the error code on the LCD RP1CAe2 keypads >does indicate the >transmitter/zone. That wasn't my point. The point is you don't get that wireless zone information at the central station. You get a generic expansion module failure signal. If you want to find out then you have to upload the event buffer, ask the customer (bad idea) or send a tech. Additionally you don't get a reliable number during wireless placement test. If Inovonics test kit says you're okay, you really okay. If Napco says 4 or better, it still might not be a good enough placement to avoid problems. "Bob La Londe" <nospam@nospam.no> wrote in message news:4702524d$0$26435$88260bb3@free.teranews.com... > "Just Looking" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:47014808$0$20596$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >>I have always thought of Napco wireless as one of the worst. In my >> experience it had the largest transmitter and battery versus range to >> receiver. On many installations I had to go back and install a second >> receiver to stop random fail to report trouble signals, even when the >> placement test said it was at least 4 or better. The wireless trouble >> signal >> never identified the guilty transmitter, it only gave some generic module >> failure signal and one had to upload the event buffer to find the actual >> wireless transmitter unit with the trouble. A real pain in the ass as far >> as >> I am concerned. > > Were you using Gemini wireless? Its some of the easiest most trouble free > stuff I have ever used, and the error code on the LCD RP1CAe2 keypads does > indicate the transmitter/zone. Even the LED for the smaller panels like > the P-800 aren't that big a deal. Also if programmed for CID most of them > can be set to send the info to the CS, and of course I setup all my new > installs for U/D from the office so if I have to I can download the log > before I ever leave the office. The only problems I have ever had from > Napco wireless is a broken transmitter (physically damaged by customer or > installer) or a low battery. > > The Linear stuff has been nothing but a pain for me. Also the Ademco > retrofit to FBII really sucked, but the current series of Ademco stuff has > been ok. I don't use much of the Ademco stuff, but I've done a few > takeover/upgrades on it. Not as easy to me as Napco Gemini to program, > but not horrible. > > As a regular dealer Napco sent me a Freedom 64 to evaluate. I plan to set > it up as a parrallel system in my new office when I have time and play > with some of the wireless as redundant coverage. Much like I had my old > office setup with multiple systems for experimentation and training. > > > -- > Bob La Londe > Fishing Arizona & The Colorado River > Fishing Forums & Contests > http://www.YumaBassMan.com > > > > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Robert L Bass (02.10.2007 19:08)
- ..... (02.10.2007 19:23)
- przyjaciel (02.10.2007 20:01)
- -=Mela=- (02.10.2007 23:47)
- Robert L Bass (03.10.2007 03:19)
- Roland More (03.10.2007 09:03)
- -=Mela=- (03.10.2007 16:13)
- Roland More (04.10.2007 07:23)
- -=Mela=- (04.10.2007 15:32)
- Robert L Bass (04.10.2007 02:07)
- przyjaciel (04.10.2007 18:53)
- Jim (03.10.2007 05:16)
- -=Mela=- (02.10.2007 23:44)
- przyjaciel (03.10.2007 00:33)
- -=Mela=- (03.10.2007 02:13)
- przyjaciel (03.10.2007 02:45)
- Mark Leuck (03.10.2007 03:49)
- Jim (03.10.2007 05:07)
