FAQ: Unpleasant Truths
Von: Anti-Democratic Initiative (antidemocraticinitiative@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 01.10.2007 18:34
Message-ID: <1191256442.35510@hotmail.com>
Newsgroup: alt.skinheads alt.activism alt.politics.usa.misc alt.society.resistance alt.philosophytalk.philosophy.misc
Datum: 01.10.2007 18:34
Message-ID: <1191256442.35510@hotmail.com>
Newsgroup: alt.skinheads alt.activism alt.politics.usa.misc alt.society.resistance alt.philosophytalk.philosophy.misc
Unpleasant Truths FAQ --------------------- Archive-Name: alt-philosophy/other/unpleasant-truths Posting-Frequency: Monthly Last-Modified: 2000/06/10 Version: .98b Introduction ------------ This FAQ presents some of the truths about human life that are most frequently denied for social reasons and reasons of cognitive dissonance. Our theory is that by getting these out of the way, we have the rest of our lives to enjoy without having to constantly reinforce illusions. 1. Death is real. There is absolutely no evidence or even indicators that suggest there is a "world beyond the material," and there is no necessary connection between that world and human beings after death. When we remove the anthropomorphic concerns from religion, we can see that the religious process is shaped around the human fear of death and need for a "reason" to live. Our staff suggests that the "reason" for existence is tautological to the process of existence. 2. Social behavior is insincere. People seem to think that in a society where we must use each other in order to make enough "profit" to survive, that social behavior is sincere and honest. This is not so. Whether at a subconscious or conscious level, human beings need each other as business partners, employees, customers and leaders. Their behavior is as a consequence involves first protecting themselves from possible social repercussions, and then assuring themselves protection in material dealings through friendship, alliance and dependency. We are blinded by anthropomorphism here also, where a normal couple of man and wife appears to us as a sensible, loving relationship; none of us think to question whether or not it is simply a friendly business partnership to raise a child, a process which benefits both individuals. 3. No one has your "best interests" in mind. Individuals have their own best interests in mind. They know you only as someone through whom they function to achieve their own goals. Otherwise, they would have to be specifically created and lying in wait to anticipate your needs. 4. Society is inefficient and expensive. Every business must make at least 100% return on every item sold (meaning: double the wholesale cost of an item to find its price on the shelf) and in most cases charge even more. The scary fact is that it has already been sold through at least one middle business, meaning that at every level of transaction, the price is being doubled at a minimum. More conventionally, the cost was a tenth of what is being charged to the next level in the system. 5. Genetics determines most of your personality. Despite mountains of research and soul-searching public displays of emotion to the contrary, most scientific evidence still suggests that the largest part (80%) or more of personality and abilities in the individual is derived from the abilities, characteristics and traits of the parents of that individual. While we like to think about how on a social level, we are all "equal" and basically the same, it is easy to see that people have different abilities by the nature of specialization. The "equality" myth exists only as a social convenience to make the individual feel accepted for his or her contribution, no matter how menial it may be, and while "equality" is given lip service by nearly every public figure, it cannot matter to them as they are acting upon their own impulse and self-interest. Thus no one is "equal" to the individual and, as the individual seeks the more proficient specialized business partners and friends/associates, there is clearly no expectation of "equality" in ability, or those associates, friends and business collaborators . 6. Evolutionary differences do exist between populations. In our world of social acceptability, things like racism and ethnic pride are not considered safe or "fair." The reason is that someone, somewhere, in the crowd, might feel that they are less "equal" and therefore less appreciated by society as a business partner and associate. However, we can tell this myth from a distance, as history itself shows the lie. If all populations were the same, political and social and technological progress would be much more closely matched between such diverse states as Africa, England and China. 7. Self-help books, religions, and counseling services are all businesses. Someone writing something "for the good of others" usually means "so I can feel good about 'helping' others." But what about the endless self-help books, religious "friends," counseling services, psychiatrists and psychologists? They operate as highly successful business because seemingly, most people need help. And as businesses they have zero financial incentive to actually "solve" any problems. Further, what would we say about someone who was so perfect they had nothing better to do than help others? We would probably realize immediately that this person's perfection was illusory. For more information, see #10 below. 8. The press lies. The press is a business dependent upon the revenues brought in by its advertisers. In the same way that in "polite society" one does not say things which would offend one's benefactors, the press studiously avoids offending its advertisers and financially- influential readership. 9. No one is really very serious about what they do. None of us serve a common goal in society. We serve in positions in which others tell us what to do. Therefore, we respond not to the external reality which shapes our natural environment, but to the demands and symbolic achievements of the "system" itself. Since this kind of arrangement means that we will inevitably become sick of other people's failings and the failings of leadership, our response becomes resentful and we stop caring at all about the outcome of our actions. Further, since we are compartmentalized in bureaucratic institutions, we rarely have contact with other parts of the system, and are required to trust the knowledge of others and pass it on to still other people. Customer: Hi, I'd like to get my account changed from active to inactive. Service Representative: You need pieces of meaningless arbitrary documentation A, B, and C, and you need to take them to counter #666. Customer: Last time I had to do this, I had to bring only pieces A and C. Service Representative: That's not true. I resent your insinuation that my authority is not genuine. Customer: When was the last time you have been to counter #666? Service Representative: Oh, actually never. It's more efficient for employees of the company to work through an internal representative. Customer: So how do you know that I need pieces A, B and C in order to inactivate my account? Service Representative: Well, that's what it says right here, in the training manual... 10. People do "good things" for their own self-image. Our benevolent illusion is that people do good things because they, as people, are good, and they like good things. More accurate predictions suggest that people like feeling good, and therefore do things externally rewarded as "good" so that they can bask in the adulation of others and achieve greater success in business and social life. 11. Most people are exasperated by other people. "Getting away from it all" is not only our vacation but also the goal used to motivate us toward a social system. If you work really hard, so goes the saying, you get set free by having enough income that you don't have to do any work, and you can buy enough land to have privacy from other people. Since we are all motivated by self-interest, it would be illusion to insist that we all work together for anything but the profit involved. Many people, in the grips of cognitive dissonance, will demand some way of justifying their expenditure of irreplaceable time on other people. They will talk about how they enjoy their jobs, or would be lost without their church, synagogue, mosque or friends. What they are really saying is that without external stimulus they would be lost; they are not speaking of people, but the social roles that people play in reinforcing through external stimulus the decisions made by an individual. At the core of this phenomenon is the low self-esteem that is common to people in a society where they must answer to the arbitrary demands of others. 12. No one is looking out for the "big picture." All humans work for self-interest. All work in compartmentalized divisions of whatever overall process of functionality is required by their specific function. Everything we react to is internal to society and the social customs which it requires in order to conduct unimpeded commerce. Consequently, our job is to react to what others think and hope someone else is looking out for the big picture. But there's a catch. Since all of us have jobs or commercial status, we must first preserve ourselves via that social device, and therefore constantly suffer under two things. First, we must please and appease our business associates, clients, and employees. Second, we must fulfill the needs of our assignment without stepping beyond our position or criticizing others higher on the scale of power than we. Consequently, we are unlikely to go "above our superiors" in order to question the direction of society as a whole. It's an unnecessary risk that could jeopardize our position. This compartmentalization is devastating. Is the President of the United States looking out for the "big picture" and "goodwill toward all humanity"? No. He's representing the United States in a social system based on commerce, and thus his goals are to pacify his allies and strike out against his competitors. So whose job is it to look out for and plan the future? You could join an "activist" group, but since people do things for their own reasons and not those of society as a whole, this succumbs to the same flaw in logic. There is no one looking out for the "big picture" or the future of planet Earth and its human cargo. Conclusion ---------- Dear reader, it is clear from meditation on these passages that humanity is not the big happy family as which we like to publicly represent ourselves. We are in fact a large self-predatory organization whose values are determined by social convenience and self-image. Once this is acknowledged, the modern individual can be safely freed from social ties to become the predator that he or she must be in order to avoid being taken advantage of by this rapacious society. The following links are a good place to begin your exploration of the "Brave New World" on the other side of socially-convenient justifications. There are useful writings by a select few iconoclasts which help the individual understand this problem, and begin the process of conversion to pro-ferality terrorist. Theodor Adorno http://hamp.hampshire.edu/~cmnF93/adorno.html Friedrich Nietzsche http://www.cwu.edu/~millerj/nietzsche/index.html Varg Vikernes Gilles Deleuze/Felix Guattari http://www.mtsu.edu/~jpurcell/Philosophy/deleuze.html Arthur Schopenhauer http://www.friesian.com/arthur.htm Spinoza Ray Prozak http://www.anus.com/ Rex Feral http://www.overthrow.com/books/index.asp?showCat=Hitman&showBook=book20010310174753.tx t Copyright © 2000-2002 Anti-Democratic Initiative[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
