Re: Samba vs NFS performance
Von: Ian Collins (ian-news@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 19.08.2008 07:29
Message-ID: <6gv41tFhq4u0U1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: alt.solaris.x86
Datum: 19.08.2008 07:29
Message-ID: <6gv41tFhq4u0U1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: alt.solaris.x86
Per Espen Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 3-machine setup, centred around a Solaris 10 box. Among other > things, the Solaris machine acts as a file server, using NFS to a Linux > machine and Samba to a Windoze machine. This all works fine, with one > major exception: NFS (and local) accesses always seem to get priority > over Samba access, so Samba performance is sometimes more or less > unusable -- it slows down from 15-35 MB/s to 1 MB/s. Unfortunately one > of the main use cases is that the Linux box writes a bunch of big files > to the Solaris box over NFS, and the files are then accessed from the > Windows box over SMB. Changing the operating systems is not an option > here. In principle I could perhaps use Samba from the Linux side too, > but there's still the problem of local accesses on the Solaris machine. > > Any ideas? Are there any parameters I can tune to speed up Samba > transfers at the cost of NFS/local access? > Two. Try OpenSolaris CIFS. Fit two NICS. -- Ian Collins.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Per Espen Hagen (19.08.2008 07:36)
- Chris (19.08.2008 07:41)
