Re: Palin's ridiculous speech fact-checked and laid bare:

On Sep 4, 9:53 pm, "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "Polarhound" <udf78322834...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:tYOdnQndRthUEF3VnZ2dnUVZ_hednZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Raymond O'Hara wrote:
> >> "CalC" <calcarpent...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:35133988-500b-40cc-a8ae-0dbefdcb2eaa@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com.
..
> >> On Sep 4, 8:04 pm, "Raymond O'Hara"
<raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> "Polarhound" <udf78322834...@comcast.net> wrote in
message
>
> >>>news:bNWdna7VU-e68l3VnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> >>>> Tom wrote:
> >>>>> Under Palin, Alaska has received hundreds of millions of
dollars in
> >>>>> earmarked funds. That's part *my* money. I want it back.
Giving
> >>>>> Alaskans tax money from any other state is vote buying, plain
and
> >>>>> simple.
> >>>> EVERY state gets hundreds of millions in earmarks every year.
> >>>> Unless you want YOUR state to give back all the money THEY got as
we
ll,
> >>>> you can take your one-sided, thoughtless blathering and blow it
out
> >>>> your
> >>>> ass.
> >>> the national earmark average is $50 per person.
> >>> the alaska average is $500 per person.
> >>> they get 10x what the rest of the country gets.
>
> >>> she's against them in public only.
>
> >>> mccain is truly against them though and under him arizona only gets $
18
> >>> per
> >>> person.
>
> >> They have a lot less people with a lot more area/roads and oil
> >> producing infrastructure to maintain dumb ass. While I agree earmarks
> >> are the wrong way to do this stop your silly ass slanted arguments.
>
> >> the state also has no sales or income tax and the state gave everybody
> >> $1000 cash
>
> >> then she asked for $197,000,000 in federal funds this year alone.
>
> >> why should massachusetts send money to alaska when alaska can afford
> >> that?
>
> > Because Massachusetts might get the stupid idea to start burying more
> > highways?
>
> massachusetts paid for the big dig.

As usual a factless lie Mass got tons of Federal money for it. Reagan
vetoed this ridiculous pork project that so many fed at the trough on
but was overriden. Notice the party lines too fruit loopy. Great state
to embarass themselves like this with this project and brag about it.
Figures you'd point to a failure like this as your shinning exaple
Ray.
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_4_big_dig.html


> massachusetts pays out more than we get back.



> the red states are the welfare states

Nonsense

>
> - Show quoted text -
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten

Raymond O'Hara (05.09.2008 05:51)