Re: OT: O.J. The epitome of irony???

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:53:12 -0500, Dan C
<youmustbejoking@lan.invalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:59:15 -0400, Abby Lockhart wrote:
>
>>>The date was not a coincidence.  The jury was in deliberation for
>>>something like 13 hours that day, and the verdict was read at something
>>>like 9-10pm.  When was the last time you heard of something like that
>>>happening?  They pushed hard for it to happen on that date, and it's just
>>>one more thing that makes the verdict look suspiciously like a
"revenge"
>>>decision.
>
>> Someone refresh my memory....wasn't the original verdict announced
>> at like 10 am or 11 am in the morning?   I seem to recall I was
>> at work at the time and that it was in the morning.
>
>I think that's about right, but what does that have to do with anything?

Notice the part in the post about deliberately waiting to announce the
verdict at 10pm?

Why announce it 10pm when the original verdict was in the morning?

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten

Dan C (07.10.2008 05:05)

Poster (08.10.2008 00:08)