Re: Minimum REQUIRED Vacation Time Around the World. Guess Who is the Loser?
Von: CalC (calcarpenter1@yahoo.com) [Profil]
Datum: 06.10.2008 01:26
Message-ID: <3f6f1bcb-30f4-4616-9b4a-c6175bf5c81f@g61g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics alt.sports.baseball.ny-metsrec.arts.tv alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox
Datum: 06.10.2008 01:26
Message-ID: <3f6f1bcb-30f4-4616-9b4a-c6175bf5c81f@g61g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics alt.sports.baseball.ny-metsrec.arts.tv alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox
On Oct 5, 7:15 pm, "Ed Stasiak" <estas...@att.net> wrote: > > Raymond O'Hara > > > if the voters want mandated vacation time we can have it. > > If as we've been told, that Americans can no longer expect > to work for the same company until retirement and we'll all > be bouncing from job to job over the course of our "work > life", then maybe we need some kinda vacation legislation? > > It doesn't seem fair that a worker's accumulated vacation time > is zeroed when they leave one company for another, so perhaps > vacation time ought to instead be based on "time within the work > force" regardless of how many and which companies they worked > for over the years? > > Of course a problem with this would be that employers would > then hire younger workers with fewer vacation days over older > workers with more accumulated vacation time. employment at will has a meaning and people should understand that when accepting or quiting a job. There are jobs you can keep for 30 years but it might lag in pay or benefits..when we (me included) leave for more/better you take risks and accept good and bad.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Ed Stasiak (06.10.2008 02:57)
