nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Minimum REQUIRED Vacation Time Around the World. Guess Who is the Loser?

Von: CalC (calcarpenter1@yahoo.com) [Profil]
Datum: 06.10.2008 01:26
Message-ID: <3f6f1bcb-30f4-4616-9b4a-c6175bf5c81f@g61g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics alt.sports.baseball.ny-metsrec.arts.tv alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox
On Oct 5, 7:15 pm, "Ed Stasiak" <estas...@att.net> wrote:
> > Raymond O'Hara
>
> > if the voters want mandated vacation time we can have it.
>
> If as we've been told, that Americans can no longer expect
> to work for the same company until retirement and we'll all
> be bouncing from job to job over the course of our "work
> life", then maybe we need some kinda vacation legislation?
>
> It doesn't seem fair that a worker's accumulated vacation time
> is zeroed when they leave one company for another, so perhaps
> vacation time ought to instead be based on "time within the work
> force" regardless of how many and which companies they worked
> for over the years?
>
> Of course a problem with this would be that employers would
> then hire younger workers with fewer vacation days over older
> workers with more accumulated vacation time.

employment at will has a meaning and people should understand that
when accepting or quiting a job. There are jobs you can keep for 30
years but it might lag in pay or benefits..when we (me included) leave
for more/better you take risks and accept good and bad.

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten