Re: The Rose Award For 4-1-2008. <7384>
Von: Andrewr1 (andyr1@socal.rr.com) [Profil]
Datum: 05.04.2008 10:00
Message-ID: <47f7315e$0$11332$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
Newsgroup: alt.sports.baseball.mn-twins alt.sports.baseball.calif-angelsrec.sport.baseball
Datum: 05.04.2008 10:00
Message-ID: <47f7315e$0$11332$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
Newsgroup: alt.sports.baseball.mn-twins alt.sports.baseball.calif-angelsrec.sport.baseball
> > > > The Rose Award goes to Vladimir Guerrero of the Los Angeles Angels, > > > who went three-for-four with three RBI and scored one run in a 9-1 win > > > over the Minnesota Twins. > > > > Guerrero and Garret Anderson combined for six hits and Jon Garland > > > breezed through his first start for the Angels. > > > He is great, but tell me, why would you reward someone for that kind > > of performance with a prize named for a guy who is banned for life > > from baseball? ?It seems kind of shameful. ?Or maybe the award is > > named for some respectable person named Rose. ?I don't know. > > > brinaj > > Great achievements beget great performances. And 4,256 hits in the > majors is a great achievement.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - >Is that a response to my post? I'm not sure I am following you, but >whatever. Pete Rose did have some great achievements in baseball. I >have never known anyone to disagree with that. But do you not see >those achievements as tarnished just a smidge by his ongoing >banishment from the game? If not, that's OK, we just have a profound >disagreement. > >brianj I understand that you think he is undeserving of the Hall of Fame, but I doubt Pete Rose cheated to get any of those 4,256 hits. As a player he was known for his hustle, above all else. He symbolizes the game the way I believe it should be played. I don't think there's anything wrong with having a player achievement award named after him. He undeniably made some major mistakes during his managerial career; maybe he made one too many head-first slides into home plate. The things he has done as a person may justify him not being in the Hall of Fame; however, the bottom line is the mark he made on the game (the one as a player, not as a gambler) is undeniable and not erasable. I think Pete Rose, the player, deserves our respect even if Pete Rose, the person, overwhelmingly does not.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- powrwrap (05.04.2008 17:59)
- Realto Margarino (07.04.2008 03:14)
- powrwrap (07.04.2008 03:35)
- Realto Margarino (07.04.2008 05:55)
- Archie Leach (08.04.2008 03:53)
- Brian J (05.04.2008 18:58)
