Re: The Letter
Von: The Raider on a Rock (troar@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 02.10.2008 02:19
Message-ID: <d14a3483-95ad-4c99-bd5c-9085c04181ad@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.sports.football.pro.oak-raiders
Datum: 02.10.2008 02:19
Message-ID: <d14a3483-95ad-4c99-bd5c-9085c04181ad@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.sports.football.pro.oak-raiders
On Oct 1, 11:53 am, Avant Grape <avantnograpec...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > The Raider on a Rock wrote: > > > > > On Oct 1, 7:51 am, carlos <carlosmach...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 1, 9:28 am, "Jr." <myo...@hi.com> wrote: > > >>> "Sac D" <S...@DeathRow.org> wrote in message > >>>news:DZKdnVaSE9k6Cn7VnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com... > >>>> "The Raider on a Rock" <tr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>news:c98a5e5c-fdb1-4749-9bf2-9017ac1ce19a@e17g2000hsg.googlegroups.co m... > >>>> On Oct 1, 4:58 am, "Sac D" <S...@DeathRow.org> wrote: > >>>>> This whole "breach of contract" stuff and the laying out the basis for > >>>>> "cause" with the letter is an interesting scenario. It's a sad stat e of > >>>>> affairs and a silver and black eye for the Raiders regardless of th e > >>>>> outcome. Clearly, Kiffin was being set up for failure/dismissal by Davis. > >>>>> Whether or not it was really warranted is a matter of speculation. > >>>>> It's a shame that Al Davis didn't think of this approach when Randy Moss > >>>>> went into his predictable funk while with the Raiders. Clearly, he was > >>>>> not > >>>>> doing the job he was hired for, when he was dogging his routes, wim ping > >>>>> over > >>>>> minor injuries, and needlessly bad mouthing "The Organization" afte r he > >>>>> reached the point where he didn't feel like playing any more. The > >>>>> record-breaking season the year following his move to NE provided a mple > >>>>> reason to sue his selfish ass and recover some of the salary he had > >>>>> collected. That was some serious change compared to what Al is work ing at > >>>>> with Kiffin now. > >>> It is a lot easier to do this to a coach than a player. A coach is > >>> considered "salaried management" where a player is considered "union" > >>> Players union would not allow AD to do this to RM. > >>> It is now coming out that Lane Kiffin lied behind AD's back and was > >>> disloyal. Seems he is getting what he deserves. > >> Hello, > > >> Why do you believe Davis? That letter seemed like a set-up to me. > > >> Carlos > > > Hello, > > > The reason you believe him is because you give credibility to people > > he has refused to talk to for decades, the press. The letter was > > legal notice, not a set up. It is standard procedure in any company > > to issue one of those when someone is violating the conditions of > > their employment. > > Bullshit. ******* It was well understood******** that Al wanted Kiffin out in the > off-season but did not want to pay Kiffin. Sending a letter a couple o f > weeks ago was indeed a set-up. Everything the press predicted in > regards to Al not wanting to pay Kiffin was spelled out long before this > season started. More importantly, Al has a history of not wanting to > pay coaches he has a falling out with. So let's get real here. > > -JC Cite your source please.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Avant Grape (02.10.2008 02:38)
