Re: MI5 Persecution: Come back, Norma! (33819)
Von: mi5victim@mi5.gov.uk [Profil]
Datum: 16.01.2008 00:25
Message-ID: <l65573961373262@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.sex.games.human-darts alt.amazon-womenes.charla.conexion.tarifa-plana alt.fashion alt.sports.soccer.manchester.united
Datum: 16.01.2008 00:25
Message-ID: <l65573961373262@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.sex.games.human-darts alt.amazon-womenes.charla.conexion.tarifa-plana alt.fashion alt.sports.soccer.manchester.united
mathematicians are intuitive and that men of intuition are mathematicians, because mathematicians wish to treat matters of intuition mathematically and make themselves ridiculous, wishing to begin with definitions and then with axioms, which is not the way to proceed in this kind of reasoning. Not that the mind does not do so, but it does it tacitly, naturally, and without technical rules; for the expression of it is beyond all men, and only a few can feel it. Intuitive minds, on the contrary, being thus accustomed to judge at a single glance, are so astonished when they are presented with propositions of which they understand nothing, and the way to which is through definitions and axioms so sterile, and which they are not accustomed to see thus in detail, that they are repelled and disheartened. But dull minds are never either intuitive or mathematical. Mathematicians who are only mathematicians have exact minds, provided all things are explained to them by means of definitions and axioms; otherwise they are inaccurate and insufferable, for they are only right when the principles are quite clear. And men of intuition who are only intuitive cannot have the patience to reach to first principles of things speculative and conceptual, which they have never seen in the world and which are altogether out of the common. 2. There are different kinds of right understanding; some have right understanding in a certain order of things, and not in others, where they go astray. Some draw conclusions well from a few premises, and this displays an acute judgment. Others draw conclusions well where there are many premises. For example, the former easily learn hydrostatics, where the premises are few, but the conclusions are so fine that only the greatest acuteness can reach[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
