nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Abrams Talks About Trek XI Movie

Von: Brad Filippone (al019@chebucto.ns.ca) [Profil]
Datum: 29.04.2008 19:11
Message-ID: <fv7ks7$4ji$1@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca>
Followup-to: alt.tv.star-trek.tos,alt.startrek,alt.tv.lost
Newsgroup: alt.tv.lost alt.startrek alt.tv.star-trek.tos
ToolPackinMama (philnblanc@comcast.net) wrote:
: ToolPackinMama wrote:
: > Led4Aces wrote:
: >> On Apr 21, 9:54 am, "Steven L." <sdlit...@earthlink.net> wrote:
: >>> GeneK wrote:
: >>>> "Steven L." <sdlit...@earthlink.net> wrote...
: >>>>> "There hadn't been this kind of action in a `Star Trek' movie
before."
: >>>> If abrams is suggesting that he's going to do the same
: >>>> thing to Star Trek that he did to MI, i.e., turn a series
: >>>> whose plots involved complex intrigue into a slam-
: >>>> bang action pic with lots of big explosions, then this
: >>>> is *really* not encouraging.
: >>> Why?  TOS got sold to NBC as action-adventure.  Any limitations on
: >>> action were not due to writing but due to cost.  Roddenberry didn't have
: >>> the budget to show entire civilizations or wars between whole
: >>> civilizations, so the scripts were written to have a few token alien
: >>> characters stand there and explain what was going on (e.g., "Let That
Be
: >>> Your Last Battlefield").
: >>
: >> Shouldn't we be thankful that Star Trek did not become an action/
: >> adventure show? I am.
: >
: > Hoo boy.  Star Trek was an action/adventure show.  Oh yes it was.  Don't
: > be ridiculous.

: Two words:  SHIRTLESS KIRK

Could we have a shirtless Uhura now?  You women have had your way for
decades.

Brad

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]