Re: *SPOILER*: Trek XI Starship Interiors
Von: Anim8rFSK (anim8rfsk@cox.net) [Profil]
Datum: 31.05.2008 06:24
Message-ID: <ANIM8Rfsk-0AEE91.21242630052008@news.west.cox.net>
Newsgroup: alt.startrek alt.tv.star-trek.tos
Datum: 31.05.2008 06:24
Message-ID: <ANIM8Rfsk-0AEE91.21242630052008@news.west.cox.net>
Newsgroup: alt.startrek alt.tv.star-trek.tos
In article <48403adf$0$14345$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote: > Jaxtraw wrote: > > Steven L. wrote: > >> Anybody wrote: > >>> In article <Jfqdna1yEP9SiqPVnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Ragnar > >>> <rworkss@comsouth.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Great. A time ship. Yet another time travel story. Hooray. > >>>> > >>>> Do they not have anyone in Hollywood who can write a Trek story > >>>> without time travel? > >>> > >>> You would first have to find one of the very few people in > >>> Hollyweird who has even one braincell, then you have to work out > >>> which of them actually has talent and creativity ... > >> > >> That's not the problem. > >> > >> The problem is how to work in Nimoy or Shatner or Nichols without the > >> cliches of time travel or flashbacks. What are you going to show? > >> They're too old to play active duty Starfleet officers. > >> > >> It's why I have said for a long time that Paramount should make a > >> fundamental decision to NOT cast any of the original TOS cast > >> anymore. Cut them loose and then you don't have to play games with > >> time travel, flashbacks, getting unstuck in time, etc., in order to > >> jump from the present day of these actors' age to some past era. > > > > My guess is they've done this in order to spin off an alternative > > timeline, thus not directly violating canon but offering room for > > canon-free future stories (including most of this one, which will > > have never happened in "Universe A"). > > Violating canon was never a problem I think. > > > > > The vitally important task for fans now is to agree a consensus > > nomenclature for the two universes. I suggest "Abramsverse" and > > "Fuckedupbybermanverse". > > > > Make that three or more universes I think. > 1. TOS, classic version. > 2. TOS remastered. > 3. TOS movies. > 4. TNG c.s. > 5. Enterprise 6 a through infinity - Voyager They had at least a dozen resets, and dozens of sub universes > 7. Abramverse. -- Star Trek 09: No Shat, No Show.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Wouter Valentijn (31.05.2008 15:28)
