Re: And asCPS is spreading the "word" about Gregory S Hanson.
Von: jacob (waterdemon1985@gmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 27.09.2007 21:49
Message-ID: <1190922543.895819.237390@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.child-protective-services
Datum: 27.09.2007 21:49
Message-ID: <1190922543.895819.237390@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.child-protective-services
On Sep 24, 1:22 pm, "freedom" <about...@KRPaboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Sep 24, 12:21 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> DS > I posted nothing that isn't public information... and I never > >> asked > >> DS > anyone to harm Greg. Where am I legally liable? > > >> KRP wrote > > >> > >>> Posting such information on the Internet is quite clearly for the > >> > >>> purpose of harassment. Given the content of your posts about Gregg in > >> > >>> total, > >> > >>> any rteasonable person would conclude you are posting his address > >> > >>> etc to > >> > >>> provoke action against him. If somebody were to act upon the > >> > >>> information > >> > >>> you > >> > >>> are posting and cause harm to somebody at Greg's home at the very least > >> > >>> you'd be an accessory before the fact. > > >> Betty wrote > > >> > >> guess you think Greg has never done the same to anyone? > > >> Got links to where I posted somebody's home address and phone #? > > >> > >> why don't you do a google search on the archives using my name and > >> > >> location with Greg as the author? > >> > >> do the same with that Donald guy, and Dan, etc. > >> > >> are you giving Greg the same advice? > > >> KRP > If you call it advice, yes. It is one thing to reply in kind as > >> I have to > >> KRP > Mr. Moore, and another to solicit problems for somebody as he > >> [Moore] has. > > >> B > I agree, I personally don't approve of the behaviors > >> B > of this person, whomever he is. > > >> Your group knows exactly who he is, and what he did before he did it. > >> The various forms of denial have been dishonest. > > >> > On the other hand, I see it happening from all sides and I don't think that > >> > 'turn about is fair play'...give the advice to all, not just those you > >> > oppose, Mr Pangborn...that will earn you some respect. > > >> Betty: > >> I pointed out TO KEN weeks ago that I have > >> not posted anybody's home address and > >> phone number. You know very well that I could have. > > >> Have I asked people to phone you collect, asked > >> people to "visit you" (as Firemonkey did) or made > >> threats of bombs, poison or acid in the face from > >> ""anonymous"" identities (As Dave did) ? > > Care to post proof that I've done anything of the sort, liar? > > > > >PS - Have you figured out why Ken has not given up > >his alma mater > > I figured this out months ago....it's because he doesn't have one. As was > PROVEN by the CV on file with a professional organization which he belonged > to. > > One of Ken's weaknesses, is that he spends a lot of time and effort denying > things which have already been proven. Such as the time he got caught > forging the atheists, or when he slipped up while posting from one of his > alias accounts. > > http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: N/A > > iQA/AwUBRvf1KAu6zDezw650EQKgfQCfZfljS07jlH3FiH0l4134dQ7u+ToAoJB+ > 1MizAPAUPZMOjapG8MQZhRzV > =v3G1 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE------ Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It's amazing how few people listen to the wolf even after you've cried his name too many times[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Dan Sullivan (27.09.2007 21:53)
- krp (28.09.2007 11:14)
- Dan Sullivan (28.09.2007 12:13)
- krp (29.09.2007 00:45)
- Dan Sullivan (29.09.2007 00:54)
- krp (29.09.2007 01:07)
