Re: new realization
Von: Rainstar (rainstar@asarian-host.net) [Profil]
Datum: 14.08.2007 07:32
Message-ID: <1187069561.535504.56900@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.dissociation
Datum: 14.08.2007 07:32
Message-ID: <1187069561.535504.56900@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.dissociation
yay u for havin' the realization! usses On Aug 13, 9:17 am, jtdgr...@lycos.com wrote: > had something kinda cool just happen. was reading work email, and the > nurse in charge of PPDs sent out a list of staff who need to get > theirs done this month. the list was clearly copied and pasted from a > database, and the first column was date of birth. > > immediately i started phrasing my response, trying to figure out how > to let him know that he shouldn't be putting people's date of birth in > an email going to so many different people. it's a breach of HIPAA > regulations, not to mention thoughtless and inconsiderate. > > when i got done scanning the list for official purposes (ie: making > sure that no one in my department needs a PPD), and would have hit > "reply", i'd already moved on to fretting about sounding know-it-all > or condescending or something for telling him he shouldn't be > including DOB. As I thought about it, I had the thought that I could > just email him to say that I'd prefer that he not include my own DOB, > and that sidetracks the issue of me sounding fault-finding and > superior or something. > > as my gut settled down, indicating that that was the "correct" > decision, i realized that i DON'T have a responsibility to let someone > know that they're doing something wrong. that i'm not going to get > "in trouble" for not saying something, and that their getting "in > trouble" if i didn't say something is NOT MY FAULT! > > it was a huge weight off of my mind! i spend a decent amount of time > feeling mildly anxious about stuff like that, with most of the > fretting being trying to figure out a way to tell people they're doing > something wrong without hurting them or insulting them or making them > think bad things about me. > > it kinda reinforces my theory that i might do pretty well with a very > mild anti-anxiety med. but i digress. > > cuz, see, it's just not that big a deal - putting the dates in, that > is - and if he needs to be corrected on it, then his supervisor is the > person who should do it. (more likely is that one of the other > directors (he's the director of nursing) will mention something in > passing...and i have an idea which one would do it...and she has the > same need to let people know when they're making a mistake that i've > had. ;) ) > > my only responsibility is to let him know that there's something > concerning *me* that i'd rather not have happen. and honestly, it > doesn't bother me much if people know my date of birth (3/19/1971). > so if i wanted to be nice and send him a response asking him not to > include my info, as an oblique reference to the fact that he shouldn't > be sending out *anyone's* dob, i could do that. > > but because it doesn't matter to me one way or another, and i'm not > responsible for whether he makes a mistake or not, i'm going to let it > go. > > and it's such an odd thought that i can do that, and it's the right > thing to do. > > now, mind you, there would be some who would say that i *do* have a > responsibility to let him know. but not at the expense of my stomach > lining. just getting jen to quiet down and stop feeling like a scared > little girl trying desperately to do everything right is worth a lot > to me. > > heh - i could even mention it to *my* supervisor in passing, and he > could decide for himself whether the nurse needs to be apprised of it > (my sup is a director). > > "I noticed that S___ included people's DOB in his PPD email this > month. It's not my place to say something to him about it, but i > figured i'd tell you, so that if you thought it's something that he > needs to know, you could maybe drop a quiet word in his ear." > > I probably won't even do that. :) i'm too happy enjoying the fact > that i don't HAVE to say anything, and don't have to worry about > "getting in trouble" for pointing out someone else's mistakes. > > jt[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
