Re: is there good & bad?(was Re: desultory array)
Von: trill (trill@cyalater.peace) [Profil]
Datum: 22.10.2007 23:39
Message-ID: <GK6dnaGVIu0ahYDanZ2dnUVZ_q2hnZ2d@comcast.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.dissociation
Datum: 22.10.2007 23:39
Message-ID: <GK6dnaGVIu0ahYDanZ2dnUVZ_q2hnZ2d@comcast.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.dissociation
yeah... please consider, if you havent already, which i infer from the post to which i respond, my frequent markers in most of enerything i write -- the "good & bad" post especially & recently. also innthar post is my ongoing idea, hope for & call for ongoing dialog w/everybody everywhere. i gotta go out now, i might post some personal history, later, to support these statements. i'm interested on how yours (personal history) inspires your philosophical ideas & ympathies. trill one more comment below: "Baba Yaga" <spamdump@phonecoop.coop> wrote in message news:44sph39shftamr1d6cn0aarkevg4hp52uj@4ax.com... > "trill" <trill@cyalater.peace> wrote, in alt.support.dissociation: > >>everything "we" (humanity) know is something that we "made," imo, or in >>accordance w/my way of thinking about stuff. > > Fair enough. > >> i perceive/construct sx as a positive, intimate expression between >>people. i choose other terms to describe other & less positive >>expressions, >>activities, experiences... > > Personally, you may do so - <giggle> thanks for this permission. i'm not insisting that anything that's only mine is the only "correct way." i'm engagin in & pursuing dialog that might develop what i perceive to be an always developing, even evolving way of thinking... "combined & uneven development" to quote one of my old favorites, k. of the notorious (m)*rx(a) bros. <more friendly & bemused about philosophy giggles> >as some people insist that only their own > version of rlgn is truly rlgs. Within the confines of a limited > circle, you may do so - as some groups insist that only their own > version of rlgn is truly rlgs, and find armony in discussion together. > > Should you wish to communicate with the mass of humanity, however, you > will find that construction insufficient. > >>"astri" <invalid@example.com> wrote in message >>news:Pine.BSI.4.64.0710200838100.8227@malasada.lava.net... >>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Baba Yaga wrote: >>> >>>> One cannot put a line between the bad and the good in any human >>>> endeavour. >> >> i disagree. >> i even think that it is important for us to do so -- to mark a >>divide between the two. i would not be able to make clear decisions about >>what i should & shouldn't do w/out a clear idea of ethics. > > Naturally. > > I expressed myself badly. I meant to intimate that good and evil can > appear in all human endeavours, that no human endeavour (neither sex, > nor even the freeing of slaves) is without potential either way. > > Baba Yaga > -- > To learn which questions are unanswerable, and /not to answer them/: > this skill is most needful in times of stress and darkness. > - Ursula LeGuin[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
