Re: Baby suffocated; mom charged with murder

Nuf said.

Ron

"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:m0l7c4t859t24fubpcn8pah8bnsci2evkf@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:36:25 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>
>>http://www.ajc.com/hawks/content/metro/stories/2008/08/29/claymom.html
>>
>>So, Ron, What makes this death Homicidal and
>>why didn't the article say?
>
>   I'm not Ron, but I'll try to dumb it down to a level you'll
> understand.
>   The autopsy showed death by asphyxiation.  The manner must have
> been consistent with homicidal asphyxia.  Charges wouldn't have been
> brought otherwise.
>   We can only guess as to the method. Perhaps strangulation, or air
> way restriction (plastic over the mouth and nose is one example).
>    You'll need to ask the publisher and/or the author of the article
> why the details weren't included.   Unless you hold the delusion that
> Ron is either, he's not likely going to know any better than you.
>
>>
>>If the prosecutor REALLY has a solid case for Murder,
>>then why did they tack on the smaller charges,
>
>    Because the prosecution believes she is guilty of those charges as
> well.  Further, the prosecution believes s/he can prove, beyond a
> reasonable doubt, Veronica committed the acts.
>    For someone who likes to claim he's erudite, you consistently
> prove you are the polar opposite.
>
>>and
>>why whine to the press about her 2004 contributing
>>to delinquency and 2006 probation violation?
>
>   Who whined?
>    The article states, "Clayton court records show..."   Outside of
> the continued proof that you're delusional, this doesn't mean anyone
> involved in the prosecution ever mentioned them to the reporter.
>    Court records, such as those listed, are available to the public.
> It's possible the reporter went to the courthouse and found the
> documentation.  We can't know based on the article.
>    Yes, it's possible the prosecution told the reporter, but there is
> nothing to support you deceptive innuendo that this must have
> happened.
>
>>
>>Isn't this a classical setup to con the person
>>into a plea bargain on the lesser charge?
>
>    Not to the more mentally balanced readers.  You probably won't
> understand.
>
>
> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
>   -- Gregory Scott Hanson, inmate 1104135, wife and child abuser.
> Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825febd@posting.google.com>
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]