Re: stars

On Apr 5, 9:36 am, "Jo again" <josi...@aol.com> wrote:
> I forgot  about them(the star rating) on the bottom part  of the post-
> 1 star meaning  one doesn't care too much for it to 5 stars meaning
> they like or appreciate the post(or can ident with it)
>  so I will now put in 5 stars for the wonderful people here and in
> other places...and I agree with those that see spam-wish there was a
> ignore author button everywhere for them...the best defense is to
> ignore...most time they will sulk , tuck their tails in and go away-
> other times they think of one's post as a challenge and see what other
> trouble they can cause-if any-what they are so ignorant about is
> people just don't CARE for their kind of BS and won't play their dum
> mental games...I use to pity these types but then I also can see it as
> acry for help or just to be noticed......
>
> On Apr 4, 8:37?pm, Daisy <sweetda...@fuse.net> wrote:

Hi,

The stars don't have anything to do with me, I "rated" messages that
were sent to me as
being excellent, I appreciate anyone who takes time to write     bob
>
>
>
> > smudgedr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Hi Jo...I read your post and just HAD to rate it the 5 stars, lol, but
> > > I don't see that it actually recorded or shows up anywhere. *shrugs*
> > > Anyways, your post made me smile a little, something I hardly do these
> > > days, and I had to reply. ?Take care and have a good day/evening....
>
> > > Rose
>
> > > Oh, wait, I see it up top now, the 5 stars, just not on the listing of
> > > topics ;-)
>
> > I don't see any stars, hehehe.....
>
> > Daisy
> > Busters Mom- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]