Re: Phonak not hearing
Von: Ken (kkerrison@ozemail.com.au) [Profil]
Datum: 16.11.2008 22:38
Message-ID: <a9d26910-2baf-4902-a212-84034db9558f@v22g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.hearing-loss
Datum: 16.11.2008 22:38
Message-ID: <a9d26910-2baf-4902-a212-84034db9558f@v22g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.hearing-loss
On Nov 17, 7:55 am, dsi1 <d...@spamworld.com> wrote: > Ken wrote: > > I cannot understand yoru reference to Phonak 'dealers'. I trust you do > > not think of audiologists in this way? Ford dealers sell, and > > maintain, Ford cars. But you don't think of a cardiologist as a stent > > dealer. > > My guess is that your audiologist does not see the manufacturers as all > the same and probably has some reason for selling - yes selling, not > supplying, that particular brand. It's likely that she was wooed by the > company and she or her associates have found favor with that brand. I > understand you point, hopefully, you can understand my point. I think > she's a dealer, you think she's a saint... :-) > > > > > Anyway the fax, and the discussion in this group worked. I got the > > following email: > > > I am sorry to hear about this. I am an audiologist and Phonak's > > director of Marketing for FM products at HQ's in Switzerland and I > > read this forum regularly. Please allow me to comment on this: > > Both HQ and our daughter companies worldwide get an incredible amount > > of e-mails. It is certainly not ill will if we fail to reply or > > respond. And sometimes spam filters are too aggressive. Nevertheless > > it is not good. > > We do consider the end-users as our main customers, in the sense that > > they should get optimal benefit and satisfaction from our products. > > But legally and officially the audiologist where your purchase your > > hearing instruments is 100% responsible for fitting, service, > > guarantee et cetera. You and/or your audiologist may disagree with > > that, but you cannot change that fact. > > We have millions of end-user customers in the whole world, and > > unfortunately it is physically not possible to have direct contacts > > with all of them. That is the role of the audiologist, who knows the > > end-user best. But a cry for help should be heard by us, no doubt, > > from whomever it comes. > > I have cc'd David Rundell, the Managing Director of Phonak Australia. > > I know David as a caring professional, and certainly not as someone > > who is not interested in small issues of individual patients. We know > > that details matter and that we should improve wherever we can. > > > With kind regards from Switzerland, > > Hans Mulder > > > This seems to support the view of dsi1, and others, that it is the job > > of the audiologist to supply filters. This misses perhaps the main > > point I was trying to make - if Phonak recommend replacing the filters > > every few months, and especially if they are free, why don't they > > include dozens of them in the kit which comes with the hearing aid? > > The dispenser does not manufacture the kits. Phonak does. > > It could be that Phonak does supply spares for the aid. I will > frequently keep the extra wax guards that come with the hearing aid > packages if I feel that the user will not change them. I will also > supply these free if the user makes a request. Not making an inquiry > into this is your main mistake but you'll have to do what makes sense to > you. > > Frankly, I feel that this is much ado about nothing - my guess is that > if asked, your audiologist will happily supply you with what you need > and mail it to you so that you won't have to make a long trip. > > > > > I will send off a fax to the office of my audiologist asking them to > > post me out a supply of the filters. Hopefully Phonak will take a > > little more care in responding to emails (if they don't want emails > > why do they quote an address on their site?). Hopefully they will > > review the number of spare filters included in their HA kits. Do you feel yourself part of a particular manufacturer's dealer network or do you dispense different brands/products depending on their performance characteristics and the needs of particular clients? I think the fact that Phonak perceives the audiologists who prescribe Phonak aids as its 'dealers' or 'resellers' is more than a fuss about nothing. It goes to the heart of the professional/patient relationship (there is a similar controversy about the extent to which pharmaceutical manufacturers treat the medical profession as part of their marketing machinery - this is not a trivial issue). And don't forget I was offering Phonak a constructive suggestion about their HA kits. One which, at negligible cost, would make life easier for them, their dispensers and every Phonak hearing aid user.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
