Fundoplication Re-Do's
Von: satxweb@gmail.com [Profil]
Datum: 11.02.2008 05:32
Message-ID: <5a530ea5-f8bb-424d-99ba-0d171156e69c@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.heartburn
Datum: 11.02.2008 05:32
Message-ID: <5a530ea5-f8bb-424d-99ba-0d171156e69c@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.heartburn
Howard, I was doing some researching online in preparation for a possible revisional laporoscopic operation depending on the Bravo/Manometry tests this month. During my research, I was shocked to read something from someone whom underwent a 2nd fundo operation. This person said that their GI doctor talked at length to them about the risks for undergoing a 2nd fundo and the high probability of scar tissue from the 1st fundo preventing a successful LAP surgery. It is especially problematic if the scar tissue is heavy in the area around the esophagus & diaphram. If he can't do it LAP, he goes in through the chest - which is major, major surgery - and not to be taken lightly. The GI Doc will not do the open surgery abdominally because he thinks the success rate is significantly reduced when the procedure is done this way. Because of scar tissue, the surgery can take 2 to 3 times longer than the first fundo. Plus, the surgeon is not working in virgin territory - the anatomy has been re-arranged, and, as a result, it can be difficult to tell where vital parts really lie when they are having to cut through a lot of scar tissue. This is a "high-rent" area and there is concern with accidently damaging the liver, speen, stomach, diaphram, esophagus, lungs, aorta, or vagas nerve when cutting the scar tissue. He always takes the first fundo completely down and redoes the entire procedure. As mentioned before, I had nissen fundoplication done in 1995 and MIGHT need to have LAP done depending on the above tests---but if I already had the first OP, is it really that risky for the 2nd Op?[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
