Autopsy evidence indicates the FBI murdered Dr. Ivins to protect the Jewish, Israeli, Mossad anthrax terrorist, Dr. Philip Zack

The autopsy evidence is: the FBI wouldn't allow an autopsy as required
by law, just a hurried cremation; therefore, the FBI are murder
suspects.

If the FBI did not murder Dr. Ivins, they wouldn't have a problem with
an autopsy being preformed, but they do; therefore, it's highly likely
the FBI framed and murdered Dr. Ivins to protect Dr. Zack and Israel.

I know what you're thinking, that the concept of the FBI protecting
terrorists is just too crazy to be believed, but .....

It wouldn't be the first time Zionist Jews launched a mass-murder,
false -(blame-it-on-the-Arabs)- flag attack against Americans and then
have the crime covered-up and censored at the highest level of our
Zionist Occupied United States government.

Israel's False Flag Attack on the USS Liberty, 1967
http://home.cfl.rr.com/gidusko/liberty/

========== excerpt =============
President Johnson went on television and announced to the American
people that TEN sailors were killed in the "six minute accidental"
attack. Sailors were ordered not to discuss the incident with ANYONE
under threat of court-martial. We waited for the investigation... and
for the explanations and the answers. Why did Israel attack the ship?
Why did the U. S. Government turn its back on the crew members? The
answers never came.

LBJ was Secretly Jewish
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/johnson_highlights.htm

Federal Bureau of Israel:
Yet another incident of the FBI claiming "suicide" of an American
murdered by the Mossad
http://www.fbicover-up.com/index.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tim Mooring: We need at least an autopsy in the death of Dr. Bruce
Ivins
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1720#comment-33766

Clarification Please!
Submitted by rnidess on Tue, 08/19/2008 - 6:27pm.
Who says a coroner listed a cause of death without an autopsy? Either
I missed that tidbit in the articles I've read or it wasn't reported.
Autopsies are required by law in all suspicious (i.e.; unanticipated
deaths in which a cause of death is not manifestly evident (as a death
due to acetaminophen/EtOh-induced liver failure would be). I'd
appreciate some kind of reference or documentation that no autopsy was
done before conjuring up unknown 'toxins' introduced in nefarious ways
before eschewing him having washed a bottle of Tylenol down with a
Stoly chaser (alcohol lowers the LD-50 of acetaminophen considerably).



Why no autopsy?
Where was his family?
Where were the 24/7 agents?
How aggressive was his treatment?
Was it really a suicide?
He was a devout Catholic.
I wonder where his paster
was through all of this?
Catholics are less prone to suicide due to
their belief system.
Catholics also rarely cremate.
If he was so dangerous, why didn't he
do as he supposedly threatened?
Why wasn't he committed to protect
himself and others by this "theripist?"
I think he would have wanted a trial
Suicide was too easy.
Hatfill cleared his name.
Why couldn't he? All info given
was circumstantial.
I would like to believe this case was
prosecuted correctly but I have serious doubts.
The "killer" may still be at large.
With the case closed danger still lurks.
Too many people had access to
his lab.
August 9, 2008 7:34 PM
Anonymous said...

By surveillance, were they just watching his house to see if he
leaves? In that case, they'd have no idea if he overdosed and was too
far gone before being taken to ER. Just a thought.
Need more info though, especially an autopsy.
August 9, 2008 10:24 PM
Anonymous said...

So did he die from the codine or the tylenol? He, as a biological
scientist could find no better drug or method of insuring an
uninterrupted suicide? He was a Catholic and suicide and cremation?
How did he spend the day of his death, where was his family, how long
did it take him to die after ingesting the tylenol?
So many questions, why does all this seem familiar to other high
profile cases over the last half century? Lone killer who dies or
never has a trial.
August 10, 2008 12:36 PM
Anonymous said...

Probably the only consistent aspects of this entire case are
contradictory facts and an overall lack of detail and clarity. This is
certainly true of the "suicide" allegations.

For example, according to the Frederick Police Department, "At the
time when officers were called to [Dr. Ivins'] home, there was nothing
to indicate it was a suicide..."
http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?storyIDx270/

Alcohol certainly could have played a role in an accidental death,
as Dr. Ivins was drinking heavily near the end of the investigation
according to his attorney ("He was drinking excessively, much later on
in the investigation."
http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid%&pid=0&sid56275&page=1 ) and to a
colleague ("Late last fall, Bruce E. Ivins was drinking a liter of
vodka some nights, taking large doses of sleeping pills and
anti-anxiety drugs..."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080503747.html?hpid=
topnews
)

Although the Justice Dept. presentation and many news reports
indicate that Dr. Ivins committed suicide because he was about to be
indicted, his attorney has said that Dr. Ivins "never knew he was 'the
suspect' in the [anthrax] attacks."
http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid%&pid=0&sid56275&page=1

Nevertheless, according to Maryland's chief medical examiner, Dr.
David Fowler, "the cause of Ivins' death was found to be an overdose
of acetaminophen... [and] was ruled a suicide based on information
from police and doctors..." (No further explanation given)
http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?StoryIDx336
August 10, 2008 6:30 PM


say it now:  F E D E R A L    B U R E A U    O F    B U L L S H I T

.........................................................................


Bureau Boys

I just love the smell of bacon
On a frosty Carolina morn'
With just a dash of napalm  <POOF!>
To keep the squealer warm
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]