• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

The clever coward, Barack Obama, quickly surrounds himself with Mossad because of what happened to JFK

Ever since Jews killed Kennedy and got away with it, we've been
Israel's bitch ...(part 2)

Rahm Emanuel: Chief of Staff, All-Around Thug
http://uncapitalist.com/blog/?itemid68
By Dark Wraith
Published at 22:10 PM on 08 November 2008 in Politics |

President-elect Barack Obama has named Congressman Rahm Emanuel as his
chief of staff. Mr. Emanuel represents the 5th District in Illinois.
He has a reputation for playing hard-ball politics that some might
describe as vicious and over-the-top, with rumors that he tore up
campaign donation checks that weren't large enough, sent a dead fish
to a political opponent (and also to a pollster), and repeatedly
stabbed a steak knife into a table while saying the word "Dead!" to
describe Democrats with whom he disagreed. In 2005, Barack Obama,
himself, even joked about Emanuel being dragged before a grand jury,
noting the coincidence that he and Robert Novak, who reported the name
of a CIA operative at the behest of Bush Administration officials,
share the same lawyer. What might have triggered Obama's reference to
Emanuel being called to testify was the long-standing ties Emanuel has
had to the infamous Chicago Democratic machine led by Mayor Richard
Daley and to a figure in Chicago politics, Donald Tomczak, who was
convicted of corruption in office.

Rahm Emanuel is the son of Dr. Benjamin Emanuel, a pediatrician who
was a member of the Zionist terrorist gang called Irgun, which carried
out acts of violence in Palestine between 1931 and 1948. Among other
terrorist acts, Irgun was responsible for the bombing of the King
David hotel in Jerusalem on July 22, 1946, where British diplomats and
their families were staying. Ninety-one people were killed. To this
day, the Israelis celebrate this act of unconscionable horror,
crafting a wholly self-serving reconstruction of the event to
exonerate the Irgun of responsibility for mass murder. Rahm has never
condemned his father's terrorist past and, in fact, remains close to
his dad. Upon being asked if his son would promote Israeli interests
as Obama's chief of staff, Benjamin said, "Obviously he will influence
the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an
Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House," thereby
leaving the impression that, at least to the elder Emanuel, Rahm can
be either a janitor for Barack Obama or a Zionist for Israel. William
Daroff, director of the Washington office of the United Jewish
Communities (UJC), an umbrella organization representing 155 Jewish
Federations and 400 independent Jewish communities across North
America, said of the new White House chief of staff, "Rep. Emanuel
is... a good friend of Israel, coming from good Irgun stock..."

President-elect Obama promised during his campaign for the presidency
to be a consensus-builder; upon winning the election, he said during
his victory speech on the night of November 4, "I will listen to you,
especially when we disagree." These words appear to ring hollow now
that he has put between him and those who would address him a
gatekeeper like Rahm Emanuel, who has no tolerance for disagreement
and who has crafted a well-earned reputation for intolerance with
troubling tendencies for violent expression of his desire to get his
own way. Indeed, Rahm Emanuel has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt
that he is "from good Irgun stock."

While Barack Obama might have posed throughout his campaign as a
prospective leader with a wide embrace of differing views, his first
major appointment has rendered evidence of a far less expansive
presidency that he plans to conduct. In essence, Mr. Obama has now
stepped in front of a mirror where all can see the reflection of his
true nature as an insular man with no plans to build any consensus
that does not meet his own desires and the agenda of the man who will
serve as his chief of staff.

While Mr. Obama's die-hard supporters may find nothing deeply
troubling and broadly indicative in his appointment of Rahm Emanuel,
other Americans may come to find out, once again, that a leader who
would choose a thug for his close ally is a President who has no
intention of governing by consensus, much less by the rule of law.

======================================

If Jews would kill their own president, would they hesitate to kill
ours ???

Compiling evidence Israelis murdered President Kennedy so Israel could
achieve and maintain a nuclear WMD monopoly in the Mideast:

==========úct # 1===============

Israel has a nuclear WMD monopoly in the Mideast.

Zionist Israel's Thermonuclear Blackmail Of America
http://www.rense.com/general35/isrnuk.htm


==========úct # 2===============

Israel is threatening to bomb Iran to maintain its nuclear WMD
monopoly in the Mideast.

bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
Oh shut the phuck up, Hymie

============úct # 3===============

CIA agent Lee Harvey Oswald didn't have a motive for killing Kennedy.
"I'm just a patsy!" was his last public utterance.

CIA Agent Oswald gave his life for Israel
http://www.rense.com/general62/oswald.htm


==========úct # 4=================

The Warren commission, like the 9-11 commission, was made up mostly of
Jews.  (The Warren commission was a Zionist convention.)

Jews have decided: Jews didn't do it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission


===============úct # 5===============

LBJ was a hard-core Zionist.  Looking at how he voted on legislation
concerning Israel shows he was a dirty whore.

JFK demanded Israel allow inspectors to see Dimona, three months later
he was assassinated and pro-Israel Johnson is President:

LBJ was Secretly Jewish
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/johnson_highlights.htm

====================================================

More Evidence Mossad Killed JFK Over Israeli Nukes
The Missing Link In The JFK Assassination Conspiracy
http://www.rense.com/general42/enemies.htm


(Note - The second item below is a letter from JFK to Israeli Prime
Minister Eshkol which makes it crystal clear JFK did NOT want the
Jewish state to develop nuclear weapons and that he was demanding
regular US inspections of the Dimona Nuclear facility...which, as we
now know, was/is used to develop Israel's enormous inventory of atomic
and thermonuclear weapons. The US Air Force white paper regarding past
and ongoing Israeli thermonuclear blackmail of the US is a stunning
look at how Zionism has exerted such staggering domination over the US
for decades. -ed)

After reading: "New JFK Assassination Theory" from WND, it is obvious
that it is just more dis-information diverting attention away from the
more than likely perpetrators, the Mossad.
It's only fair to remind or inform your readers of the theory posed by
Michael Collins Piper in 'Final Judgment'. His theory makes more sense
than anything.

Final Judgement Reviewed by Mark Braver

There seems to be a lot of misperception of what Final Judgment does
and does not say about the JFK assassination. The book does not say
that "the Jews killed JFK." That's horse manure.

What the book does say is that: When New Orleans District Attorney Jim
Garrison charged businessman Clay Shaw with participation in the JFK
assassination conspiracy Garrison stumbled upon the Israeli Mossad
connection to the murder of President Kennedy. Shaw served on the
board of a shadowy corporation known as Permindex. A primary
shareholder in Permindex was the Banque De Credit International of
Geneva, founded by Tibor Rosenbaum, an arms procurer and financier for
the Mossad.

What's more, the Mossad-sponsored Swiss bank was the chief "money
laundry" for Meyer Lansky, the head of the international crime
syndicate and an Israeli loyalist whose operations meshed closely on
many fronts with the American CIA.

The chairman of Permindex was Louis M. Bloomfield of Montreal, a key
figure in the Israeli lobby and an operative of the Bronfman family of
Canada, long-time Lansky associates and among Israel's primary
international patrons.

In the pages of "Final Judgment" the Israeli connection to the JFK
assassination is explored in frightening--and fully documented--
detail. For example, did you know:

* That JFK was engaged in a bitter secret conflict with Israel over
U.S. East policy and that Israel's prime minister resigned in disgust,
saying JFK's stance threatened Israel's very survival?

* That JFK's successor, Lyndon Johnson, immediately reversed America's
policy toward Israel?

* That the top Mafia figures often alleged to be behind the JFK
assassination were only front men for Meyer Lansky?

* That the CIA's liaison to the Mossad, James Angleton, was a prime
mover behind the cover-up of the JFK assassination?

Why didn't Oliver Stone, in his famous movie "JFK" not mention any of
this? It turns out the chief financial backer of Stone's film was
longtime Mossad figure, Arnon Milchan, Israel's biggest arms dealer.

The very fact that the Israeli lobby has gone through such great
lengths to try to smear Michael Collins Piper and to try to discredit
Final Judgment gives the book great credibility. If the book was
really so silly or so unconvincing, it doesn't seem likely that groups
such as the Anti-Defamation League would go out of their way to try to
suppress the book as they have.

The fact is that Piper demonstrates that Israel did indeed have a very
strong motive to want to get JFK out of the way and that numerous
people who have been linked in other writings to the JFK conspiracy
were (as Piper documents) also in the sphere of influence of Israel's
Mossad. Not only Clay Shaw in New Orleans, but also James Angleton at
the CIA, who was Israel's strongest advocate at the CIA and also the
CIA's liaison to the Mossad. The Israeli connection is indeed "the
missing link in the JFK assassination conspiracy."

The "Reader from Chicago" who wrote the review of Final Judgment
posted here is really off the beam and I suspect he (or she) is
deliberately distorting what Piper's book does say in order to try to
discourage people from reading it.

The fact is that Piper's book documents (quite clearly, in my
estimation) not only the means, opportunity and the motive for Israeli
Mossad involvement in the assassination (working in conjunction with
the CIA), but it is also quite fascinating and very interesting read.
"Boring" is the last word I'd use to describe the book, and it is
certainly not "poorly written."

What's more, the book is not--I repeat--not "anti-Semitic" and the
book has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the subject of the
Holocaust. In fact, anybody familiar with any of the standard writings
on the JFK assassination will recognize the names of some of the key
players in the scenario Piper documents: Clay Shaw, David Ferrie, Guy
Banister and James J. Angleton of the CIA--and none of them were
Jewish. So where this reviewer gets off saying that Piper finds "a Jew
under every rock" is beyond me. I have read literally hundreds of
books and magazine articles and other material on the JFK
assassination and not in a single one of them--with the exception of
Final Judgment--did I ever learn that President John F. Kennedy was
trying to stop Israel from building the nuclear bomb and that this
literally touched off a "secret war" behind the scenes between JFK and
Israel's prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, who resigned (among other
reasons) in disgust over JFK's policies with Israel. In fact, Israeli
historian Avner Cohen in his book, Israel and the Bomb, documents this
quite thoroughly.

And in Final Judgment Piper also outlines some interesting Israeli
connections by people who have been linked to the JFK assassination
and cover-up, including Clay Shaw of New Orleans. Even Israeli
journalist Barry Chamish has written in an Internet review of Final
Judgment that he finds Piper's Israeli connection (via Shaw and
Permindex) quite convincing.

There was a controversy in the Chicago area following an attempt by
the Anti-Defamation League (an Israeli lobby organization) and people
associated with the ADL to prevent Final Judgment from being placed in
the Schaumburg Township District Library. Chances are the Reader from
Chicago is probably an ADL representative! --This text refers to the
Unknown Binding edition.


____________________________________________________


JFK's Concern Over Israel's Nuclear Bomb Program

(Letter from our President to the Jews that killed him)

Letter To Israeli PM Eshkol July 5, 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister (Eshkol),

It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you
assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our
friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these
that I am writing you at this time.

You are aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime
Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits (ie: inspections -ed)
to Israel's nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime
Minister wrote to me on May 27. His words reflected a most intense
personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your
Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime
Minister's strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted
exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also ofIsrael's
willingness to permit periodic visits (ie: inspections -ed) to Dimona.

I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption
of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem
necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further
considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion's May 27 letter, as to
the nature and scheduling of such visits.

I am sure you will agree that these visits should be as nearly as
possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all
doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. As I wrote Mr.
Ben-Gurion, this Government's commitment to and support of Israel
could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were
unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the
peace as the question of Israel's effort in the nuclear field.

Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules
of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel's purposes are to be
clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would
best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer,
another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months.
I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more
difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27
letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion's
letter was in accord with this, that our scientist have access to all
areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such
as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that
sufficient time to be allotted for a thorough examination.

Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this
matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and
internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have
your most sympathetic attention.

Sincerely,
John F. Kennedy

http://www.jfkmontreal.com/toc.htm

...
D E A T H   T O   A M E R I C A      ...and take Israel with ya.

Antworten