Special Commentary - Homeless Van Sleeper Tasered By Police Wasn't A Stanford Student

Re: Palo Alto Homeless Update - Homeless van sleeper tasered by
police

Special Commentary for the Newsgroup alt.society.homeless

Tasered Homeless Man Should Have Stood Up Against the Stanford
Students

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, I wrote:

>
> On Jun 1, 4:31?pm, dhm_at_best_dot_...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> http://www.paloaltodailynews.com/article/2008-6-1-taser
>
> http://www.paloaltodailynews.com/article/2008-7-30-ciampi
>
> Homeless man given hard time trynig to get police camera videos
>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.homeless/browse_thread/thread/99ed3a9bdc8ff1af/
ddba75d224b98b90?lnk=gst&q=taser#ddba75d224b98b90

Joseph Anthony (Tony) Ciampi was a member of the Stanford Homeless
Action Coalition (SHAC) in the mid 1990's.  Tony was not a Stanford
student.  Back then, he and the other indigent non-students were
warned by me that the student activists were short-changing the
Homeless because after 10 years the students would have wealthy,
uppity jobs while he and the other underclass would still be indigent
and homeless.

This is exactly how it turned out.  "To each according to one's
academic admission and degree."

Here is a list of most SHAC members who were Stanford students:

Terry O'Day - currently chairman of the Santa Monica Planning
Commission,
wealthy co-owner of an electric car rental company, and policy
creating member of a non-profit pressure group called Environment
Now.  He would not
have obtained capital for his career except for his Stanford degree.

Lily Batchelder - Professor of Tax Law, NYU Law School.  She recently
had the honors of presenting well-trodden views on income averaging to
a
Congressional committee and would not have been received so graciously
without her Stanford degree.

Scott Handleman - a/k/a "Comrade Subcommandante Scott" - San
Francisco
Attorney.  A Stanford degree helped a lot, didn't it?  Without the
Stanford admission and degree, he would surely be labeled a Communist,
and Activist, or something similarly perjorative.  He has had plenty
of incentive to accept the "system" that he supposedly opposes.

Theo Emery - Reporter - Associated Press (?)

All non-student associates of SHAC remain poor and underclass.  They
are a notch on the former Stanford students' resumes.

As far as I'm concerned, Tony was tasered by the police because he and
the others never stood up against the Stanford students for the half-
assed activism they represented.  Tony may now very well expect
getting a stiff prison sentence for assaulting a police officer
because of that.

As Anatole France might say,

"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich, as well as the
poor,
to sleep under the bridges or in vehicles, to beg in the streets, and
to steal bread."

As I previously said, the Real Constitution says "First you gentrify
people, then you gentrify services to support and accomodate them,
then everyone else can go to hell."  So the schools like Stanford help
create a caste system for America.  The SHAC students were the
beneficiaries of SHAC, not the have-nots.

One thing the judge and attorneys will look at are Tony's
credentials.  Santa Clara County feminista judges are notorious for
minimizing or dropping charges against credentialatura and making them
wealthy while stiffing the have-nots.  So there is a good chance that
Tony will get screwed no matter how much missing video evidence there
is.  It is only one factor to be more or less weighed.  Tony's lack of
elitist credentials could weigh a lot against him.


--
Copyright 2008 by D.H. Myers.  For personal use only.

------
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]