Re: elizabeth loftus

"Stephen Morgan" <grauniad2liberty@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:7131cb39-5188-4cd8-a646-2e80d9ec5086@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > Thanks Ken for straightening that out.
>
> > > The issue is not the FMSF but the concept of false memories.
>
> > > Even if Loftus and the FMSF are totally corrupt (I don't know),
> > > what she says is just common sense. The burden of proof
> > > is on those asserting 'recovered memory' is reliable, and they
> > > have never met it - not only that, there is positive evidence
> > > against them. That's enough for me.
>
> > You're inverting the burden of proof. When you accuse someone of lying
> > because they're supposedly deluded you have to prove they're deluded.
>
> < Are you pretending that "recovered memory" was
> < proven to be reliable in court?
>
> Greg, Mr. Morgan is claiming that recovered memories are "TOTALLY
> INFALLIBLE."

< I think you'll find I have yet to offer any opinion on recovered
< memories. I merely pointed out that the False Memory syndrome
< Foundation was a club for paedophiles and veterans of CIA mind control
< programmes.

Steve you have been out in the sun WAY too long!
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]