nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Tjab's itch in his speedos

Von: tjab (tjab@wam.umd.edu) [Profil]
Datum: 10.09.2008 15:14
Message-ID: <ga8h84$587@rac3.wam.umd.edu>
Newsgroup: talk.politics.guns misc.legal alt.true-crime alt.law-enforcement alt.fan.bob-larson
In article <50rdc4lvb4mr9vk7jfkfli7m2ce8gjk4kf@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills  <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 9 Sep 2008 09:59:08 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>> Also Kent knows that if I did call and find out the incident as
>>>>>described didn't happen and therefore was no police report I would
go
>>>>>online and rip him a new opening.
>>>>
>>>>"If" you called?
>>>
>>>    A bit of a reading comprehension problem?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>You said you were going to call by the end of last week. What
>>>>did you find out?
>>>
>>>    The same as I suspect you found.  There is a report.
>>
>>Are you speaking for Moe now? Sorry, I'd like to hear from her
>>whether she made the call.
>
>    You really need a remedial reading course.
>    Did you miss the word "suspect" in my reply, or did you chose to
>ignore it so that you can continue your deception?

"Suspect" modified "you found." Not "The same." In English
you would
say what you now claim you intended to say like this: "I suspect she
found the same as I suspect you found."

Of course, you would still be lying.

>    I'll accept either answer.

You'll accept the answer I give you and like it.

Addressing Moe: You said you were going to call by the end of last week.
What did you find out?


















































[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten