Re: elizabeth loftus

"Greegor" <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8e230161-ddee-47cd-a31c-6d5961dd4dab@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > Thanks Ken for straightening that out.
>
> > > The issue is not the FMSF but the concept of false memories.
>
> > > Even if Loftus and the FMSF are totally corrupt (I don't know),
> > > what she says is just common sense. The burden of proof
> > > is on those asserting 'recovered memory' is reliable, and they
> > > have never met it - not only that, there is positive evidence
> > > against them. That's enough for me.
>
> > You're inverting the burden of proof. When you accuse someone of lying
> > because they're supposedly deluded you have to prove they're deluded.
>
> < Are you pretending that "recovered memory" was
> < proven to be reliable in court?
>
> Greg, Mr. Morgan is claiming that recovered memories are "TOTALLY
> INFALLIBLE." He is a "TRUE BELIEVER" and he claims that everyone who
> disagrees with him is a "pedophile" (they spell it funny in England).

KRP > He INSISTS that everyone who disagrees
KRP > with him is a pervert!

< How convenient!

He's a "TRUE BELIEVER!" PRAISE THE LORD!
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]