• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: MADD is at it again

Brent P <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:ypWdnZokPI42mHHVnZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d@comcast.com:

>
> http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/25/2557.asp
>
> MADD is doing their usual bit with regard to checkpoints, interlocks,
> and so on. This time in Texas.
>
> Interesting fact:
>
> "In a 2005 decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that 99.29
> percent of drivers stopped at state roadblocks were innocent. The
> results also showed that it took 53 percent more effort to make an
> arrest with a roadblock than to use traditional roving patrol
> techniques."
>
> Yet, the federal government uses the gasoline tax money that is supposed
> to be used to fix bridges and such to have local PDs run checkpoints.
> Maybe the checkpoints offer something that old fashion patrols that
> would put safety first don't. Nahh it couldn't have anything to do with
> puncturing another hole in our rights.... that would be tin foil
> hattery!
>
>
>

As i've said  many times, one of the best ways to combat drunk driving is
to make it a felony.  Knowing they will lose their right to have guns will
make these redneck drunk drivers think twice.

Antworten