• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Bill Bonde has gone back into really stupid mode ... Simpsondidn't KIDNAP anybody fercrisesakes!!!

John Rennie wrote:
>
> "Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy who brought the
> gun'' )" <tributyltinpaint@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:48EBA39D.4CB2F91B@yahoo.co.uk...
> >
> >
> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy who brought
> >> the gun'' ) wrote:
> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy who
brought
> >> >> the gun'' ) wrote:
> >> >>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy
who
> >> >>>> brought the gun'' ) wrote:
> >> >>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than
the guy who
> >> >>>>>> brought the gun'' ) wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for
him than the guy who
> >> >>>>>>>> brought the gun'' ) wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>> Donna Evleth wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> From: "Bill Bonde {
''Free OJ, no more time for him than the
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> guy who brought the gun''
)" <tributyltinpaint@yahoo.co.uk>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Organization: Our legacy is
not the lives we lived but the
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> lives we leave to those who 
come after us.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.law-enforcement,alt.true-crime,misc.legal,talk.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> politics.misc,uk.legal
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008
00:24:55 +0100
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Bill Bonde has
gone back into really stupid
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mode ... Simpson didn't  
KIDNAP  anybody fercrisesakes!!!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> It isn't even a crime to be
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> addicted to drugs.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> But it is a crime to possess
illegal drugs.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Which I'm sure you know isn't a
requirement to be addicted to
> >> >>>>>>>>> them.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> God damn you are one pig-ignorant
imbecile, aren't you boy?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> So tell us how one can be addicted to
drugs without possessing
> >> >>>>>>>> those drugs?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Rush Limbaugh was addicted to prescription
medications when he
> >> >>>>>>> was in rehab. At that time, he had no access,
at least illegal
> >> >>>>>>> access, to the drugs.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> While Rush Limpballs got himself addicted, he did
possess, ipso
> >> >>>>>> facto, the illegal drugs he obtained via
prescription fraud.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> But we weren't talking about any period of time. We
were talking
> >> >>>>> about your claim that it was necessary to have (at
every specific
> >> >>>>> instance of time) illegal drugs to be addicted to
drugs. That's
> >> >>>>> not true. It's not a crime to be addicted to illegal
drugs.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> You still haven't shown how one can be addicted to
illegal
> >> >>>> drugs without possessing those drugs.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> Yes I did. I explained how Limbaugh was addicted to drugs
when he
> >> >>> was getting treatment and had no access to illegal drugs at
that
> >> >>> time.
> >> >>
> >> >> You once again evaded the issue of how he got the illegal
> >> >> drugs he became addicted to.
> >> >>
> >> > I didn't think that was a valid issue.
> >>
> >> Your evasion and acquiessance of the point is noted.
> >>
> > It's not a valid point. Being addicted to drugs isn't illegal. That
> > is what I said and you insisted otherwise claiming that being
> > addicted to drugs was illegal because the person couldn't become
> > addicted to drugs without access *at some time* to illegal drugs.
> > You were wrong in that that doesn't make being addicted to drugs
> > illegal.
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>> Being addicted to drugs isn't a crime.
> >> >>
> >> >> Tell us again how one can be addicted to illegal drugs without
> >> >> possessing them.
> >> >>
> >> > I did tell you. The issue here is essentially one of aspect and
> >> > perhaps tense:
> >>
> >> No, it's a matter of law.
> >>
> > It could be a matter of law but what we were talking about was
> > aspect.
> >
> >
> >
> >> Now tell us again how one can be addicted to illegal drugs without
> >> possessing those illegal drugs.
> >>
> > You could've become addicted when you had the drugs and still be
> > addicted after you didn't have them anymore.
> >
> >
> >> Or just admint that you're a stammering ignoramus and move on.
> >>
> > No.
>
> Surely somebody loves and admires you, Bill?
>
Apparently not around here.

(Notice how I didn't attack the other poster for "admint"?)



--
"Oh, I'm broke."
"Take another mortgage, don't give in."
"I thought you were broke. Where did you get all that money from?"
"Don't question me."
"Where did you get it?"
"I borrowed it from the bank."
"Well, you can't do that, that's cheating."
"Listen you little stoat, I own Park Lane, I can borrow as much
bloody money as I like."
~Joanna Lumley and Julia Sawalha, "Absolutely Fabulous"

Antworten