Handling people in distress ...
Von: Twittering One (mournenwould@aol.com) [Profil]
Datum: 07.11.2009 18:18
Message-ID: <2bcb0a31-2580-4c8b-a19a-7d3e6adc5c8c@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: misc.health.alternative alt.true-crime
Datum: 07.11.2009 18:18
Message-ID: <2bcb0a31-2580-4c8b-a19a-7d3e6adc5c8c@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: misc.health.alternative alt.true-crime
"The family of a police lieutenant who committed suicide last year is suing the city, claiming that police officials drove him to kill himself. The suit maintains that the officials vilified the officer, Lt. Michael W. Pigott, after a confrontation in Brooklyn in which the lieutenant’s order to shoot an emotionally disturbed man with a Taser gun led to the man’s death." http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/family-of-officer-who-committe d-suicide-sues-city/#comment-559625 ___________________________________ These events were certainly a tragedy for both families, however … “Police officials told Lieutenant Pigott later that he might be criminally prosecuted …” If so, the decision to prosecute was in the hands of Charles Hynes, the Brooklyn District Attorney; and likely, the NYPD administration had the responsibility of communicating this to Lt. Piggot, as a matter of informing him of his right to to remain silent, etc. “… and that the city would not defend him if he was sued by Mr. Morales’s family… ” As for civil suits, is this a standard protocol for any government official, or more specifically, officers on duty? ” …according to the lawsuit. Mr. Pigott was also ashamed by the department’s assertions that he had “screwed up,” the lawsuit says. ” I do not recall reading that NYPD Police Commissiner Kelly said the Lt. screwed up; I do recall a proper admission by NYPD that this was improper use of a taser; I congratulate the NYPD on having such a regulation for taser-use and recognizing in this instance that regulations had not been followed in this death. As for taking away his badge and gun, and reasigning the Lt. to desk duty, this was highly proper: The Lt. was indeed in deep distress; he should not have have a gun; nothing is wrong with that procedure. What were the options of keeping the Lt alive? Lock him up in Belleuve psych ward, against his will, and tie him down, shoot him with Haldol?[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Twittering One (07.11.2009 18:36)
- Twittering One (07.11.2009 18:39)
