nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: The spammers have won

Von: Ralph Fox (-rf-nz-@-.invalid) [Profil]
Datum: 08.09.2008 09:23
Message-ID: <i9k9c45c4m7t732t30uq3bei8i7thn4ifb@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:19:36 +0100, in message
<v9h8c4t86tvdj6j78osjq3has82nn4i63k@4ax.com>,
Marc Wilson wrote:

> In alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent,  (Ralph Fox) wrote in
> <pb26c41ch3gbcj0me4dnsuu7j2nuco2ufu@4ax.com>::
>
> >On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:09:09 +0100, in message
<s044c4dljkd0hf7kgvqko4c6r5qh622t39@4ax.com>,
> >Marc Wilson wrote:
> >
> >> We've had this argument before.
> >>
> >> It's *my* time I want to save, not CPU time.
> >
> >
> >Some like you may be happy to walk away from the computer and
> >leave Agent doing its thing, but others are not.
> > •  Recent example (with compacting):
<oa2a24l1tvcn1jbnu7vo66bg30pcgglu83@4ax.com>
> > •  Recent example (with sorting):   
<8e1fa49c0o72n2kmqt3p4pk7thl8ep29am@4ax.com>
> >Judging by the posts in here, those who don't want to save CPU time
> >(like you) are well-outnumbered by those who do.
> >
>
> Fine.  It doesn't have to be mandatory- if it doesn't suit you, don't
> use it.  I don't use (e.g.) NZB files, as they have no relevance to me.


The point is not about being mandatory.
The point is about whether the request makes a good business case.



[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]