Re: The Longest War: Navy Deaths in Vietnam
Von: rwalker (rwalker@despammed.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.09.2008 21:06
Message-ID: <48c03213$0$15634$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>
Newsgroup: alt.war.vietnam
Datum: 04.09.2008 21:06
Message-ID: <48c03213$0$15634$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>
Newsgroup: alt.war.vietnam
"Ed Medlin" <ed@ edmedlin.com> wrote in message news:1Yvvk.19909$jI5.12894@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com... > > "rwalker" <rwalker@despammed.com> wrote in message > news:48bd61ea$0$12386$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >> "Otis Willie PIO The American War Library" <themilitarytoday@pacbell.net> >> wrote in message news:n5nlb4leb9ee4j2fc83emh5g021keheidq@4ax.com... >>> The Longest War: Navy Deaths in Vietnam >>> >>> From the Webmaster: Type of duty Killed In Action Percent of Total Navy >>> KIA... >>> >>> http://members.aol.com/warlibrary/usnkia.htm >>> >>> >> >> Just curious. Why so many Navy ground deaths? Were they serving with >> Marine units? > Marine Corpmen are Navy. Also, all deaths on boats (inland) are considered > "ground" deaths since they were not technically "at sea". If death occured > on a boat while transiting along the coast then it would be considered a > death "at sea". The relatively few of these seem about right since there > were few threats to us there overall. > > > Ed- > USN RM2 > 3rd Marine Amphibs Danang > NSA Danang Lighterage > MACV Advisory Group Vietnamazation Program Binh Thuy > >> > > Thanks. That would certainly explain it.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
